From: vigneshr@ti•com (Vignesh R)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/6] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Remove unwanted reg_se_cache save
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:44:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BF7C14.1080907@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150120160410.GL13701@x1>
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 09:34 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, R, Vignesh wrote:
>> On 1/20/2015 5:23 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Wed, 07 Jan 2015, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>
>>>> In one shot mode, sequencer automatically disables all enabled steps at
>>>> the end of each cycle. (both ADC steps and TSC steps) Hence these steps
>>>> need not be saved in reg_se_cache for clearing these steps at a later
>>>> stage.
>>>> Also, when ADC wakes up Sequencer should not be busy executing any of the
>>>> config steps except for the charge step. Previously charge step was 1 ADC
>>>> clock cycle and hence it was ignored.
>>>> TSC steps are always disabled at the end of each conversion cycle, hence
>>>> there is no need to explicitly disable TSC steps by writing 0 to REG_SE.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti•com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> v5:
>>>> - Remove unnecessary clearing of REG_SE
>>>>
>>>> drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 13 +++++--------
>>>> include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h | 1 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Looks fine.
>>>
>>> For my own reference:
>>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro•org>
>>>
>>> Can this patch be applied on its own?
>>>
>>
>> I prefer to wait until input patches are picked up.
>
> I have no problem with that, but is there a technical reason why?
>
Nothing, in particular. This patch alone has no impact on the
performance of TSC/ADC unit. Patch 2/6 is necessary to observe the
changes caused by this series. Hence, please wait until those patches
are picked up.
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
>>>> index 467c80e1c4ae..e4e4b22eebc9 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
>>>> @@ -68,12 +68,6 @@ static void am335x_tscadc_need_adc(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tsadc)
>>>> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>>>> u32 reg;
>>>>
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * disable TSC steps so it does not run while the ADC is using it. If
>>>> - * write 0 while it is running (it just started or was already running)
>>>> - * then it completes all steps that were enabled and stops then.
>>>> - */
>>>> - tscadc_writel(tsadc, REG_SE, 0);
>>>> reg = tscadc_readl(tsadc, REG_ADCFSM);
>>>> if (reg & SEQ_STATUS) {
>>>> tsadc->adc_waiting = true;
>>>> @@ -86,8 +80,12 @@ static void am335x_tscadc_need_adc(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tsadc)
>>>> spin_lock_irq(&tsadc->reg_lock);
>>>> finish_wait(&tsadc->reg_se_wait, &wait);
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Sequencer should either be idle or
>>>> + * busy applying the charge step.
>>>> + */
>>>> reg = tscadc_readl(tsadc, REG_ADCFSM);
>>>> - WARN_ON(reg & SEQ_STATUS);
>>>> + WARN_ON((reg & SEQ_STATUS) && !(reg & CHARGE_STEP));
>>>> tsadc->adc_waiting = false;
>>>> }
>>>> tsadc->adc_in_use = true;
>>>> @@ -96,7 +94,6 @@ static void am335x_tscadc_need_adc(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tsadc)
>>>> void am335x_tsc_se_set_once(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tsadc, u32 val)
>>>> {
>>>> spin_lock_irq(&tsadc->reg_lock);
>>>> - tsadc->reg_se_cache |= val;
>>>> am335x_tscadc_need_adc(tsadc);
>>>>
>>>> tscadc_writel(tsadc, REG_SE, val);
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h b/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
>>>> index 3f4e994ace2b..1fd50dcfe47c 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
>>>> @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@
>>>>
>>>> /* Sequencer Status */
>>>> #define SEQ_STATUS BIT(5)
>>>> +#define CHARGE_STEP 0x11
>>>>
>>>> #define ADC_CLK 3000000
>>>> #define TOTAL_STEPS 16
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-21 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 5:49 [PATCH v6 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes Vignesh R
2015-01-07 5:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] input: touchscreen: ti_am335x_tsc Interchange touchscreen and ADC steps Vignesh R
2015-01-07 5:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] input: touchscreen: ti_am335x_tsc: Remove udelay in interrupt handler Vignesh R
2015-01-30 5:26 ` Vignesh R
2015-02-03 19:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-01-07 5:49 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Remove unwanted reg_se_cache save Vignesh R
2015-01-20 11:53 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-20 12:40 ` R, Vignesh
2015-01-20 16:04 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 10:14 ` Vignesh R [this message]
2015-02-05 6:21 ` Vignesh R
2015-02-25 4:07 ` Vignesh R
2015-02-25 7:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-07 5:49 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] input: touchscreen: ti_am335x_tsc: Read charge delay from DT Vignesh R
2015-01-07 5:49 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] ARM: dts: AM335x: Make charge delay a DT parameter for TSC Vignesh R
2015-01-07 5:49 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] input: touchscreen: ti_am335x_tsc: Replace delta filtering with median filtering Vignesh R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BF7C14.1080907@ti.com \
--to=vigneshr@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox