public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sboyd@codeaurora•org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 14:03:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554BD33D.7050907@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMAWPa_n+59+v+x3fKkmdtW1wMJF7kqtTjLLowmv1xwGWprYJw@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/07/15 08:17, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora•org> wrote:
>> On 05/01/15 15:07, Heiko St?bner wrote:
>>> Am Freitag, 1. Mai 2015, 13:52:47 schrieb Stephen Boyd:
>>>
>>>>> Instead I guess we could hook it less deep into clk_get_sys, like in the
>>>>> following patch?
>>>> It looks like it will work at least, but still I'd prefer to keep the
>>>> orphan check contained to clk.c. How about this compile tested only patch?
>>> I gave this a spin on my rk3288-firefly board. It still boots, the clock tree
>>> looks the same and it also still defers nicely in the scenario I needed it
>>> for. The implementation also looks nice - and of course much more compact than
>>> my check in two places :-) . I don't know if you want to put this as follow-up
>>> on top or fold it into the original orphan-check, so in any case
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech•de>
>>> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech•de>
>> Thanks. I'm leaning towards tossing your patch 2/2 and replacing it with
>> my patch and a note that it's based on an earlier patch from you.
> It appears this has landed in linux-next in the form of 882667c1fcf1
> clk: prevent orphan clocks from being used.  A bunch of boot failures
> for sunxi in today's linux-next[1] were bisected down to that patch.
>
> I confirmed that reverting that commit on top of next/master gets
> sunxi booting again.
>
>

Thanks for the report. I've removed the two clk orphan patches from
clk-next. Would it be possible to try with next-20150507 and
clk_ignore_unused on the command line? Also we can try to see if
critical clocks aren't being forced on by applying this patch and
looking for clk_get() failures

------8<------

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
index 7e1e2bd189b6..d88585b680bb 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
@@ -1347,6 +1347,9 @@ static void __init sunxi_init_clocks(const char *clocks[], int nclocks)
 
 		if (!IS_ERR(clk))
 			clk_prepare_enable(clk);
+		else
+			pr_err("Failed to enable critical clock %s\n",
+					clocks[i]);
 	}
 }
 

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-07 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-22 20:53 [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks Heiko Stuebner
2015-04-22 20:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: track the orphan status of clocks and their children Heiko Stuebner
2015-04-30 23:20   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-04-22 20:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] clk: prevent orphan clocks from being used Heiko Stuebner
2015-04-30 23:20   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-04-25 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks Stefan Wahren
2015-04-25 13:44   ` Heiko Stübner
2015-04-26 19:58 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-05-01  0:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-01 19:59   ` Heiko Stübner
2015-05-01 20:52     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-01 22:07       ` Heiko Stübner
2015-05-01 23:40         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-07  8:22           ` Tero Kristo
2015-05-07 18:18             ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-08 11:41               ` Tero Kristo
2015-05-07 15:17           ` Kevin Hilman
2015-05-07 21:03             ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-05-08  0:27               ` Kevin Hilman
2015-05-08  6:53                 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-08  8:13                   ` Sascha Hauer
2015-05-08  9:30                     ` Heiko Stübner
2015-05-08  9:53                       ` Sascha Hauer
2015-05-08 10:02               ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-12 22:35                 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-13 13:03                   ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-13 14:33                     ` Kevin Hilman
2015-05-13 20:14                       ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-13 20:44                         ` Kevin Hilman
2015-05-13 20:51                           ` Maxime Ripard
2015-07-27  8:57                 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-30 10:09                   ` Maxime Ripard
2015-08-11 22:34                     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-08-12  8:26                       ` Heiko Stübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=554BD33D.7050907@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox