public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ddaney@caviumnetworks•com (David Daney)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v12 5/5] arm64, mm, numa: Add NUMA balancing support for arm64.
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:26:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D0A6C9.40907@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160226185356.GO29125@arm.com>

On 02/26/2016 10:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 05:58:23PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
>> From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks•com>
>>
>> Enable NUMA balancing for arm64 platforms.
>> Add pte, pmd protnone helpers for use by automatic NUMA balancing.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium•com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks•com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium•com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/Kconfig               |  1 +
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index 9f0972a..6e22503 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ config ARM64
>>   	select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
>>   	select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
>>   	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
>> +	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
>>   	select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB
>>   	select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
>>   	select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index bf464de..5af9db2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -346,6 +346,21 @@ static inline pgprot_t mk_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot)
>>   	return __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT);
>>   }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
>> +/*
>> + * See the comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
>> + */
>> +static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
>> +{
>> +	return (pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PROT_NONE)) == PTE_PROT_NONE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
>> +{
>> +	return pte_protnone(pmd_pte(pmd));
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> Can these not be macros, like our other pte_* and pmd_* predicates in
> this header file?

They probably could be.  However there is precedence for the static 
inline form:

$ git grep pte_protnone | grep '\.h' | grep -v return
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h:static inline int 
pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h:static inline int 
pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h:static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
include/asm-generic/pgtable.h:static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)


Actually I am a little surprised that all the arm64 pte_* and pmd_* 
things are not written as static inline to achieve added type safety. 
The generated code should be identical.


>
> Will
>

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-26 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-23  1:58 [PATCH v12 0/5] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms David Daney
2016-02-23  1:58 ` [PATCH v12 1/5] efi: ARM/arm64: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them David Daney
2016-02-23 11:58   ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-23 12:16     ` Will Deacon
2016-02-23 12:20       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-23 22:12     ` Rob Herring
2016-02-24 19:38       ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-24 19:03     ` Frank Rowand
2016-02-24 19:30       ` Rob Herring
2016-02-24 19:33       ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-23  1:58 ` [PATCH v12 2/5] Documentation, dt, numa: dt bindings for NUMA David Daney
2016-02-23  1:58 ` [PATCH v12 3/5] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation David Daney
2016-02-29 17:29   ` Robert Richter
2016-02-29 18:13     ` David Daney
2016-02-29 19:45       ` Robert Richter
2016-02-29 22:56         ` David Daney
2016-02-23  1:58 ` [PATCH v12 4/5] arm64, numa: Add NUMA support for arm64 platforms David Daney
2016-02-23 10:26   ` Will Deacon
2016-02-23 17:34     ` David Daney
2016-02-23 17:39   ` David Daney
2016-02-26 18:53   ` Will Deacon
2016-02-26 19:51     ` David Daney
2016-02-27  4:13       ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-29 10:12         ` Robert Richter
2016-02-29 17:34   ` Robert Richter
2016-02-29 23:42     ` David Daney
2016-03-01 12:21       ` Robert Richter
2016-02-23  1:58 ` [PATCH v12 5/5] arm64, mm, numa: Add NUMA balancing support for arm64 David Daney
2016-02-26 18:53   ` Will Deacon
2016-02-26 19:26     ` David Daney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56D0A6C9.40907@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=ddaney@caviumnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox