public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns•dev>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno•tech>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm•com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie•org>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail•com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre•com>,
	Roman Beranek <me@crly•cz>, Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland•org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel•org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org, linux-clk@vger•kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists•linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] clk: sunxi-ng: Consider alternative parent rates when determining NKM clock rate
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2023 11:29:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qim1eow.fsf@oltmanns.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vvmdk3fqtjt3jspxgvlbypdxajchymydshya5b5ivk3wfodwwr@yyi26m6toosh>


On 2023-06-07 at 14:27:46 +0200, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno•tech> wrote:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:35:20AM +0200, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
>> So, my question: Is spending the 30 ms fine or do I need to optimize for
>> speed in order for this patchset to be accepted? Or is 2 ms also too
>> much of an increase, in which case I'm out of ideas. :-)
>
> You keep mentioning it, but it's really not clear to me why you think
> that both are intertwined, or depend on one another?

I'm sorry about that. I guess, I got carried away. And furthermore I
took your mentioning of all bets being of how often setting rates
happens when HDMI comes into play as encouragement to optimize for
speed, which it clearly wasn't.

I saw the increase in time as a regression, because it might break
boards that I don't have access to. But since you say it's fine, I'll
speak no more of it.

> What's wrong with just merging (some later version of) this series?

Nothing. :-)

Thanks,
  Frank

>
> Maxime
>
> [[End of PGP Signed Part]]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2023-06-08  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-05 19:07 [PATCH 0/2] clk: sunxi-ng: Consider alternative parent rates when determining NKM clock rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-05 19:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: consider alternative parent rates when finding rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-07  6:38   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-06-07  7:39     ` Frank Oltmanns
     [not found]       ` <sijbhopoxuw5wodyry3smg7tm4wzoc7k6xakt4qdvxqsok32mv@u7rh4dct5ya6>
2023-06-12 16:29         ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-13  9:10           ` Maxime Ripard
2023-06-13 10:17             ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-13 15:30               ` Maxime Ripard
2023-06-15 16:04                 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-19 16:36                   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-06-19  8:16             ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-19 18:05               ` Maxime Ripard
2023-06-20 18:51                 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-26 16:45                   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-12  4:39                 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 14:06                   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-23  8:59                     ` Frank Oltmanns
     [not found]                       ` <q4mwg2dhwaxofbaaiyao7nmyfh4mat4ic2avxbzpmwhq6fmzyx@dflrio4loms5>
2023-07-30 14:35                         ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-05 19:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: allow pll-mipi to set parent's rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-07  7:35 ` [PATCH 0/2] clk: sunxi-ng: Consider alternative parent rates when determining NKM clock rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-07 12:27   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-06-08  9:29     ` Frank Oltmanns [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871qim1eow.fsf@oltmanns.dev \
    --to=frank@oltmanns$(echo .)dev \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists$(echo .)linux.dev \
    --cc=maxime@cerno$(echo .)tech \
    --cc=me@crly$(echo .)cz \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre$(echo .)com \
    --cc=samuel@sholland$(echo .)org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=wens@csie$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox