From: arno@natisbad•org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:14:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a9hagex1.fsf@natisbad.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131112083633.GB10318@1wt.eu> (Willy Tarreau's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:36:33 +0100")
Hi,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt•eu> writes:
>> That been said, even if the driver is most probably not the only one to
>> blame here (considering the result of bisect and current thread on
>> netdev), I never managed to get the performance I have on my ReadyNAS
>> Duo v2 (i.e. 108MB/s for a file served by an Apache) with a mvneta-based
>> platform (RN102, RN104 or RN2120). Understanding why is on an already a
>> long todo list.
>
> Yes I found that your original numbers were already quite low,
Tests for the rgression were done w/ scp, and were hence limited by the
crypto (16MB/s using arcfour128). But I also did some tests w/ a simple
wget for a file served by Apache *before* the regression and I never got
more than 60MB/s from what I recall. Can you beat that?
> so it is also possible that you have a different problem (eg: faulty
> switch or auto-negociation problem where the switch goes to half
> duplex because the neta does not advertise nway or whatever) that is
> emphasized by the latest changes
Tested w/ back to back connections to the NAS from various hosts and
through different switch. Never saturated the link.
> I can confirm that I got this message from you on netdev so it should be OK
> now.
Good. Thanks for the info.
a+
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-10 13:53 [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 6:48 ` Cong Wang
2013-11-12 7:56 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 8:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 9:14 ` Arnaud Ebalard [this message]
2013-11-12 10:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 15:34 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-13 7:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-17 14:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-17 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 6:44 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-19 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 17:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 18:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 18:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 23:53 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 0:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 0:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 0:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 0:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 8:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-20 19:21 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 19:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 19:26 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 21:28 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 21:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 0:44 ` Willy Tarreau
[not found] ` <20131121183834.GB18513@1wt.eu>
2013-11-21 19:04 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask (was: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s) Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-21 21:51 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask (was: [BUG, REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+, 3.12: " Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 22:01 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask Rob Herring
2013-11-21 22:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 21:51 ` [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 21:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-21 22:55 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 23:23 ` Rick Jones
2013-11-20 17:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 17:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:52 ` David Miller
2013-11-20 17:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 18:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 18:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 19:22 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-18 10:09 ` David Laight
2013-11-18 10:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 10:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-18 10:44 ` Simon Guinot
2013-11-18 16:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-11-18 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-18 10:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 17:58 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a9hagex1.fsf@natisbad.org \
--to=arno@natisbad$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox