public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse•com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel•org>
Cc: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse•com>,
	linux-pwm@vger•kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel•org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel•org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel•org>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom•com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom•com>,
	devicetree@vger•kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists•infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi•com>,
	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse•de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:27:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adjQl37-6a--_y3Y@apocalypse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adiW1tBC8Imd14LD@monoceros>

Hi Uwe,

On 08:27 Fri 10 Apr     , Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Andrea,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 06:16:41PM +0200, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> > On 23:45 Sun 05 Apr     , Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 04:31:55PM +0200, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> > > > +static void rp1_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> > > > +	u32 value;
> > > > +
> > > > +	value = readl(rp1->base + PWM_CHANNEL_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> > > > +	value &= ~PWM_MODE_MASK;
> > > > +	writel(value, rp1->base + PWM_CHANNEL_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> > > > +
> > > > +	rp1_pwm_apply_config(chip, pwm);
> > > 
> > > What is the purpose of this call?
> > 
> > To update the configuration on the next PWM strobe in order to avoid
> > glitches. I'll add a short comment in the code.
> 
> .pwm_free() should not touch the hardware configuration. Changing the
> pinmuxing (which I guess is the purpose of clearing PWM_MODE_MASK) is
> somewhat a grey area. If that saves energy, that's okish. Otherwise
> not interfering with the operation of the PWM (e.g. to keep a display on
> during kexec or so) is preferred.

Sorry I should've been more clear on this. The pinmux/conf is not changed
at all by this mask, only the PWM output mode is. The controller can output
several type of waveforms and clearing PWM_MODE_MASK is just setting the
controller to output a 0, which is the reset default i.e. the same value
as just before exporting the channel.
I guess this is the expected behaviour in case of a fan, it should stop
spinning in case you unexport the pwm channel, but I see it could be
different with displays.
Honestly I don't have a strong opinion about that, please just let me
know if I should drop that pwm_free entirely.

> 
> > > > +static int rp1_pwm_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return clk_prepare_enable(rp1->clk);
> > > 
> > > Hmm, if this fails and then the driver is unbound, the clk operations
> > > are not balanced.
> > 
> > I'll add some flags to check if the clock is really enabled or not.
> 
> To be honest, I guess that is a problem of several drivers, not only in
> drivers/pwm. If this complicates the driver, I guess addressing this
> isn't very critical.

I'll come up with something, we can always drop this check if deemed
too 'noisy'. 

Many thanks,
Andrea

> 
> Best regards
> Uwe




  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-10 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-03 14:31 [PATCH 0/3] Add RP1 PWM controller support Andrea della Porta
2026-04-03 14:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller Andrea della Porta
2026-04-05  7:52   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-07  8:29     ` Andrea della Porta
2026-04-03 14:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver Andrea della Porta
2026-04-05 21:45   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-04-09 16:16     ` Andrea della Porta
2026-04-10  6:27       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-04-10 10:27         ` Andrea della Porta [this message]
2026-04-10 10:47           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-04-03 14:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: broadcom: rp1: Add PWM node Andrea della Porta
2026-04-05  7:53   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-05 21:48   ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adjQl37-6a--_y3Y@apocalypse \
    --to=andrea.porta@suse$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom$(echo .)com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom$(echo .)com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=naush@raspberrypi$(echo .)com \
    --cc=robh@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=svarbanov@suse$(echo .)de \
    --cc=ukleinek@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox