* linux-next: dwmw2 tree build failure
@ 2008-09-04 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-04 8:06 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-09-04 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: linux-next
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 729 bytes --]
Hi David,
Today's linux-next build (/scratch/sfr/x86_64_allmodconfig/Makefile) failed like this:
arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c: In function 'intel_g33_dmar':
arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c:102: error: syntax error before '=' token
arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c:104: error: 'status' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c:107: error: 'dmar_disabled' undeclared (first use in this function)
Introduced by commit 1bc3029e516e62baa14318888985075f3f3a9f7e ("Blacklist
DMAR on Intel G31/G33 chipsets"). I have reverted that commit.
Please, at least build test this stuff. :-(
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: dwmw2 tree build failure
2008-09-04 0:51 linux-next: dwmw2 tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
@ 2008-09-04 8:06 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2008-09-04 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 10:51 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Today's linux-next build (/scratch/sfr/x86_64_allmodconfig/Makefile) failed like this:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c: In function 'intel_g33_dmar':
> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c:102: error: syntax error before '=' token
> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c:104: error: 'status' undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c:107: error: 'dmar_disabled' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> Introduced by commit 1bc3029e516e62baa14318888985075f3f3a9f7e ("Blacklist
> DMAR on Intel G31/G33 chipsets"). I have reverted that commit.
>
> Please, at least build test this stuff. :-(
I did, but perhaps building with CONFIG_DMAR would have been more
appropriate. :)
Sorry about that -- having killed the machine I was testing this on, I
transplanted my tests to a new machine, and forgot the configs were
different.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel•com Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-04 8:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-04 0:51 linux-next: dwmw2 tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-04 8:06 ` David Woodhouse
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox