Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the audit tree

public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat•com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	Richard Briggs <rgb@redhat•com>,
	sparclinux@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the audit tree
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:32:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1398184360.2596.7.camel@flatline.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140422162207.55e3d9f09244de281b9798cc@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 16:22 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> After merging the audit tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> In file included from include/linux/audit.h:29:0,
>                  from mm/mmap.c:33:
> arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
> arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h:131:9: error: 'TIF_32BIT' undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h:131:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 
> And many more ...
> 
> Caused by commit 374c0c054122 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch
> for all arches").
> 
> I applied this patch for today:
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:18:53 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] fix ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
> ---
>  arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h
> index fed3d511b108..a5a8153766b3 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h
> @@ -128,8 +128,12 @@ static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
>  
>  static inline int syscall_get_arch(void)
>  {
> +#if defined(__sparc__) && defined(__arch64__)
>  	return test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? AUDIT_ARCH_SPARC
>  					   : AUDIT_ARCH_SPARC64;
> +#else
> +	return AUDIT_ARCH_SPARC;
> +#endif
>  }
>  
>  #endif /* __ASM_SPARC_SYSCALL_H */
> -- 

I swear I saw this and I fixed it.  Drat.  Do we want to do it this way?
Above in syscall_get_arguments() they use

#ifdef CONFIG_SPARC64
        if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_32BIT))
                zero_extend = 1;
#endif

Is CONFIG_SPARC64 a better choice than:
   defined(__sparc__) && defined(__arch64__)

Maybe even better would be to copy what you suggested in powerpc:

---

diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h
index fed3d51..49f71fd 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h
@@ -128,8 +128,7 @@ static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
 
 static inline int syscall_get_arch(void)
 {
-	return test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? AUDIT_ARCH_SPARC
-					   : AUDIT_ARCH_SPARC64;
+	return is_32bit_task() ? AUDIT_ARCH_SPARC : AUDIT_ARCH_SPARC64;
 }
 
 #endif /* __ASM_SPARC_SYSCALL_H */
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_32.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_32.h
index 96efa7a..acd2be0 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_32.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_32.h
@@ -130,6 +130,8 @@ register struct thread_info *current_thread_info_reg asm("g6");
 #define _TIF_DO_NOTIFY_RESUME_MASK	(_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | \
 					 _TIF_SIGPENDING)
 
+#define is_32bit_task()	(0)
+
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
 
 #endif /* _ASM_THREAD_INFO_H */
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
index a5f01ac..5a4f660 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h
@@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ register struct thread_info *current_thread_info_reg asm("g6");
 				 _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
 #define _TIF_DO_NOTIFY_RESUME_MASK	(_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_SIGPENDING)
 
+#define is_32bit_task()	(test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT))
+
 /*
  * Thread-synchronous status.
  *

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-22 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-22  6:22 linux-next: build failure after merge of the audit tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22 15:56 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-22 16:32 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2014-04-22 21:27   ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-06  6:27 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06 16:54 ` Eric Paris

find likely ancestor, descendant, or conflicting patches for this message:
( dfblob:fed3d51 dfblob:49f71fd dfblob:96efa7a dfblob:acd2be0
dfblob:a5f01ac dfblob:5a4f660 )
 OR (
bs:"Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the audit tree" )
	(help)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1398184360.2596.7.camel@flatline.rdu.redhat.com \
    --to=eparis@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=rgb@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox