* Missing signoffs in the hte tree
@ 2023-04-24 12:07 Mark Brown
2023-05-01 19:40 ` Dipen Patel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2023-04-24 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dipen Patel; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 430 bytes --]
Commits
1af0f6b5060cf ("hte: tegra-194: Use proper includes")
3798a6e3b6a89 ("hte: Use device_match_of_node()")
981501927e482 ("hte: tegra-194: Fix off by one in tegra_hte_map_to_line_id()")
58e1189d075a4 ("hte: tegra: fix 'struct of_device_id' build error")
499c35fe9bf2e ("hte: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence")
in the hte tree for today are missing a Signed-off-by from their
committers.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Missing signoffs in the hte tree
2023-04-24 12:07 Missing signoffs in the hte tree Mark Brown
@ 2023-05-01 19:40 ` Dipen Patel
2023-05-02 0:03 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dipen Patel @ 2023-05-01 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
On 4/24/23 5:07 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Commits
>
> 1af0f6b5060cf ("hte: tegra-194: Use proper includes")
> 3798a6e3b6a89 ("hte: Use device_match_of_node()")
> 981501927e482 ("hte: tegra-194: Fix off by one in tegra_hte_map_to_line_id()")
> 58e1189d075a4 ("hte: tegra: fix 'struct of_device_id' build error")
> 499c35fe9bf2e ("hte: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence")
>
> in the hte tree for today are missing a Signed-off-by from their
> committers.
Shouldn't Acked-by tag from me (maintainer of the HTE tree) enough? I mean it does imply signed-off-by, right?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Missing signoffs in the hte tree
2023-05-01 19:40 ` Dipen Patel
@ 2023-05-02 0:03 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2023-05-02 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dipen Patel; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1074 bytes --]
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 12:40:16PM -0700, Dipen Patel wrote:
> On 4/24/23 5:07 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 1af0f6b5060cf ("hte: tegra-194: Use proper includes")
> > 3798a6e3b6a89 ("hte: Use device_match_of_node()")
> > 981501927e482 ("hte: tegra-194: Fix off by one in tegra_hte_map_to_line_id()")
> > 58e1189d075a4 ("hte: tegra: fix 'struct of_device_id' build error")
> > 499c35fe9bf2e ("hte: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence")
> > in the hte tree for today are missing a Signed-off-by from their
> > committers.
> Shouldn't Acked-by tag from me (maintainer of the HTE tree) enough? I mean it does imply signed-off-by, right?
No, not at all - the signoff has specific meaning with regard to the
developer certificate of origin [1] - whoever applies the commit needs
to supply a signoff to say that they're asserting that the DCO is being
followed. This is separate to review (though if a maintainer is
applying a patch that's generally at least as good as an ack so no need
for anything else).
[1] https://developercertificate.org/
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-02 0:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-24 12:07 Missing signoffs in the hte tree Mark Brown
2023-05-01 19:40 ` Dipen Patel
2023-05-02 0:03 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox