From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat•com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:14:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081125071436.GA9660@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081125175708.d28d08cd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:44:16 -0500 Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat•com> wrote:
> >
> > Yep, it was the wrong constraint used in the asm. Googling around, I
> > found a similar bug listed in gcc, which was not a bug.
>
> Amazing what we trip over :-(
>
> > Patch has been sent to fix this.
>
> Can you put that patch in your tree as well, or will it reach
> linux-next quickly enough anyway?
i've applied the assembly constraint fix to the x86 tree and i've
integrated a new version of auto-x86-next which includes the fix, and
pushed it out.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-25 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 3:21 linux-next: ftrace tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25 3:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-11-25 4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25 4:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-11-25 5:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25 5:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-11-25 6:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25 7:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-25 7:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25 5:24 ` Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-07 0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-07 9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 21:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-02 9:07 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-02 9:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 10:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-02 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-25 3:07 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25 3:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-11-25 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-25 7:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-25 14:57 ` John W. Linville
2008-11-25 18:46 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-26 0:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-26 0:14 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-08-25 3:08 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25 6:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-25 6:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-25 6:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25 3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25 6:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-25 16:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-25 16:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-15 2:27 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-15 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-15 8:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081125071436.GA9660@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
--cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=srostedt@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox