public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
@ 2008-12-29  8:26 Stephen Rothwell
  2008-12-29  8:36 ` [xfs-masters] " Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-12-29  8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Chinner, xfs-masters; +Cc: linux-next

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1909 bytes --]

Hi David,

Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c: In function 'xfs_iflush_int':
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:3055: warning: format '%Lu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:3062: warning: format '%Lu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:3072: warning: format '%Lu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:3083: warning: format '%Lu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:3095: warning: format '%Lu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:3102: warning: format '%Lu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c: In function 'xlog_recover_do_inode_trans':
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c:2300: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 6 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c:2311: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 5 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c:2344: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 7 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c:2357: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 7 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c:2370: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 7 has type 'xfs_ino_t'
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c:2380: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 7 has type 'xfs_ino_t'

I am just flagging these to be consistent.  Ingo will probably say
something about u64 and unsigned long long vs. unsigned long ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
  2008-12-29  8:26 linux-next: xfs tree build warnings Stephen Rothwell
@ 2008-12-29  8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2008-12-29  8:51   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2008-12-29  8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: David Chinner, xfs-masters, linux-next

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 07:26:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

Yeah, just noticed when doing my first ppc64 build after a while.  For
now I threw a patch in to always make xfs_ino and unsigned long long
and it works so far.  I'll make sure this or another fix goes in through
the usual ways.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
  2008-12-29  8:36 ` [xfs-masters] " Christoph Hellwig
@ 2008-12-29  8:51   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-12-29  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: David Chinner, xfs-masters, linux-next

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 722 bytes --]

Hi Christoph,

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:36:50 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst•de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 07:26:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi David,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> Yeah, just noticed when doing my first ppc64 build after a while.  For
> now I threw a patch in to always make xfs_ino and unsigned long long
> and it works so far.  I'll make sure this or another fix goes in through
> the usual ways.

Thanks.  We do seem to be actually getting somewhere towards making u64
unsigned long long everywhere ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-29  8:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-29  8:26 linux-next: xfs tree build warnings Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29  8:36 ` [xfs-masters] " Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-29  8:51   ` Stephen Rothwell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox