* 2.6.30 material is OK now? @ 2009-01-19 23:28 David Miller 2009-01-20 1:01 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2009-01-19 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sfr; +Cc: linux-next Stephen is it OK for 2.6.30 bound material to start showing up in -next? Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.30 material is OK now? 2009-01-19 23:28 2.6.30 material is OK now? David Miller @ 2009-01-20 1:01 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-01-20 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller; +Cc: linux-next [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 343 bytes --] Hi Dave, On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:28:09 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@davemloft•net> wrote: > > Stephen is it OK for 2.6.30 bound material to start > showing up in -next? Yep, see my other email. Thanks for asking, though. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-20 1:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-01-19 23:28 2.6.30 material is OK now? David Miller 2009-01-20 1:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox