* Re: new xfs git tree
[not found] <20090119011601.GA14708@infradead.org>
@ 2009-01-27 6:41 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-29 21:14 ` Felix Blyakher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-01-27 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: xfs, linux-next
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:16:01 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead•org> wrote:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs.git has all the fixes the
> have been peer-reviewed by the usual crowd, but still waiting for
> a "maintainer" to respond..
Should we include that in linux-next?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: new xfs git tree
2009-01-27 6:41 ` new xfs git tree Andrew Morton
@ 2009-01-29 21:14 ` Felix Blyakher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Felix Blyakher @ 2009-01-29 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-next, xfs
On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:16:01 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead•org
> > wrote:
>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs.git has all the fixes the
>> have been peer-reviewed by the usual crowd, but still waiting for
>> a "maintainer" to respond..
>
> Should we include that in linux-next?
As a new maintainer, I confirm that official xfs repository
git://oss.sgi.com/oss/git/xfs/xfs was synced with kernel.org
repo at one point and is being updated with the new patches
on a regular basis. AFAIK, it's up-to-date now.
Felix
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-29 21:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20090119011601.GA14708@infradead.org>
2009-01-27 6:41 ` new xfs git tree Andrew Morton
2009-01-29 21:14 ` Felix Blyakher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox