* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets [not found] <a4423d670903180734w7270a4f3qa2af3981b969436c@mail.gmail.com> @ 2009-03-18 16:58 ` Alexander Beregalov 2009-03-19 6:44 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-18 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller, LKML, Netdev, linux-next@vger•kernel.org 2009/3/18 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com>: > Hi > > Ultra 10 can boot, it receives DHCP answer, ssh works, but few minutes > after machine becomes unresponsible by net at all. > It does not respond even on ARP requests. > > On Sparc host I see that `TX packets` does not grow, but RX grows. > The state of the interface is > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST > > There is no relevant kernel messages in dmesg. > > next-20090317 worked fine. > > > Let me know if I can help. > I have reproduced it on next-20090318 for the second time, but still do not know how. next-20090317 might be affected. Now both packet counters grow, but tcpdump cannot capture any packet. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets 2009-03-18 16:58 ` next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-19 6:44 ` David Miller 2009-03-19 8:16 ` Alexander Beregalov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2009-03-19 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: a.beregalov; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, linux-next From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:58:40 +0300 > 2009/3/18 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com>: > > Hi > > > > Ultra 10 can boot, it receives DHCP answer, ssh works, but few minutes > > after machine becomes unresponsible by net at all. > > It does not respond even on ARP requests. > > > > On Sparc host I see that `TX packets` does not grow, but RX grows. > > The state of the interface is > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST > > > > There is no relevant kernel messages in dmesg. > > > > next-20090317 worked fine. > > > > > > Let me know if I can help. > > > > I have reproduced it on next-20090318 for the second time, but still > do not know how. > next-20090317 might be affected. > > Now both packet counters grow, but tcpdump cannot capture any packet. Does the current vanilla kernel work fine? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets 2009-03-19 6:44 ` David Miller @ 2009-03-19 8:16 ` Alexander Beregalov 2009-03-23 4:51 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-19 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, linux-next 2009/3/19 David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>: > From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com> > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:58:40 +0300 > >> 2009/3/18 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com>: >> > Hi >> > >> > Ultra 10 can boot, it receives DHCP answer, ssh works, but few minutes >> > after machine becomes unresponsible by net at all. >> > It does not respond even on ARP requests. >> > >> > On Sparc host I see that `TX packets` does not grow, but RX grows. >> > The state of the interface is >> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST >> > >> > There is no relevant kernel messages in dmesg. >> > >> > next-20090317 worked fine. >> > >> > >> > Let me know if I can help. >> > >> >> I have reproduced it on next-20090318 for the second time, but still >> do not know how. >> next-20090317 might be affected. >> >> Now both packet counters grow, but tcpdump cannot capture any packet. > > Does the current vanilla kernel work fine? Yes. The problem happens only with -next tree. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets 2009-03-19 8:16 ` Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-23 4:51 ` David Miller [not found] ` <20090322.215110.261185328.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2009-03-23 4:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: a.beregalov; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, linux-next From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:16:20 +0300 > 2009/3/19 David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>: > > Does the current vanilla kernel work fine? > > Yes. The problem happens only with -next tree. I have one of my ultra10s up and will try to reproduce and diagnose this locally. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20090322.215110.261185328.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets [not found] ` <20090322.215110.261185328.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2009-03-24 11:32 ` Alexander Beregalov 2009-03-24 15:46 ` Alexander Beregalov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-24 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Kernel Testers List >> 2009/3/19 David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public•gmane.org>: >> > Does the current vanilla kernel work fine? >> >> Yes. The problem happens only with -next tree. > > I have one of my ultra10s up and will try to reproduce and diagnose > this locally. Hi David 2.6.29 also does not work. The guilty patch should be between 2.6.29-rc8 and final 2.6.29 even more narrow - 59fcbdd..v2.6.29 I can try to bisect. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets 2009-03-24 11:32 ` Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-24 15:46 ` Alexander Beregalov 2009-03-24 15:50 ` Alexander Beregalov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-24 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller, Roel Kluin Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, linux-next, Kernel Testers List 2009/3/24 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com>: >>> 2009/3/19 David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>: >>> > Does the current vanilla kernel work fine? >>> >>> Yes. The problem happens only with -next tree. >> >> I have one of my ultra10s up and will try to reproduce and diagnose >> this locally. > > Hi David > > 2.6.29 also does not work. > > The guilty patch should be between 2.6.29-rc8 and final 2.6.29 > > even more narrow - 59fcbdd..v2.6.29 > > I can try to bisect. e4a389a9b5c892446b5de2038bdc0cca8703c615 is first bad commit commit e4a389a9b5c892446b5de2038bdc0cca8703c615 Author: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail•com> Date: Wed Mar 18 23:12:13 2009 -0700 net: kfree(napi->skb) => kfree_skb ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets 2009-03-24 15:46 ` Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-24 15:50 ` Alexander Beregalov 2009-03-24 20:23 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-24 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller, Roel Kluin Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, linux-next, Kernel Testers List 2009/3/24 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com>: > 2009/3/24 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com>: >>>> 2009/3/19 David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>: >>>> > Does the current vanilla kernel work fine? >>>> >>>> Yes. The problem happens only with -next tree. >>> >>> I have one of my ultra10s up and will try to reproduce and diagnose >>> this locally. >> >> Hi David >> >> 2.6.29 also does not work. >> >> The guilty patch should be between 2.6.29-rc8 and final 2.6.29 >> >> even more narrow - 59fcbdd..v2.6.29 >> >> I can try to bisect. > > e4a389a9b5c892446b5de2038bdc0cca8703c615 is first bad commit No, it is wrong, sorry. I will do more tests tomorrow. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets 2009-03-24 15:50 ` Alexander Beregalov @ 2009-03-24 20:23 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2009-03-24 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: a.beregalov; +Cc: roel.kluin, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-next, kernel-testers From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:50:55 +0300 > 2009/3/24 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail•com>: > > e4a389a9b5c892446b5de2038bdc0cca8703c615 is first bad commit > > No, it is wrong, sorry. > I will do more tests tomorrow. I bet it is the problem we are discussing here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123789980524715&w=2 Herbert has posted two patches to try and fix this issue, you can try the second one to see if it solves your bug too. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-24 20:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <a4423d670903180734w7270a4f3qa2af3981b969436c@mail.gmail.com>
2009-03-18 16:58 ` next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-19 6:44 ` David Miller
2009-03-19 8:16 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-23 4:51 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20090322.215110.261185328.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-24 11:32 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-24 15:46 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-24 15:50 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-03-24 20:23 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox