From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership•com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation•org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk•ukuu.org.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: Request for linux-next inclusion of the voyager tree
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:35:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090611113543.29528bf3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090610165331.GA31096@elte.hu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 963 bytes --]
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:53:31 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu> wrote:
>
> * James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership•com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, so this is an acceptable compromise for me too.
> >
> > What I think now is needed (from me) are three patch sets:
> >
> > 1. The final subarchitecture cleanups
> > 2. The quirk model/smp ops additions
> > 3. The voyager put back.
>
> Yes, that looks fine.
>
> You can have them in a single series for convenience if you want to
> (it's probably easier for you to test that way) - but 3 separate
> series are fine too, no strong preference either way - as long as
> the internal structure and details follows the ordering and
> parameters we outlined in previous mails.
OK, given this looks like a rewrite of the voyager tree, I will drop it
from linux-next for a while.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 16:10 Request for linux-next inclusion of the voyager tree James Bottomley
2009-06-08 23:28 ` Tony Breeds
2009-06-10 14:45 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-09 9:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-09 13:49 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-09 20:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-09 20:33 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-09 21:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-09 23:41 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-09 23:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 0:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-10 0:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 1:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-10 15:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-10 15:28 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-10 15:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-10 16:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 16:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 14:23 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-10 15:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-10 15:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-10 15:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 16:02 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-10 16:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 1:35 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2009-06-11 1:39 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090611113543.29528bf3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership$(echo .)com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk$(echo .)ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox