* linux-next: tip tree question
@ 2009-10-12 3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-12 6:49 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-10-12 3:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra
Cc: linux-next, LKML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 760 bytes --]
Hi all,
I noticed that the auto-latest branch of the tip tree (which is what is
included in linux-next) has had the tip out-of-tree branch merged into
it. This seems to just introduce lots of commits into linux-next that
have nothing to do with the tip tree (some of which contain fixes that
are also in Linus' tree) and adds a localversion-tip file.
I was wondering if this was done out of necessity or by oversight.
I have reverted commit e67d8da85f7a4c2772fe3731de9396b6d01a045e ("Merge
branch 'out-of-tree' into auto-latest") from linux-next for today and the
x86_64 allmodconfig and powerpc ppc64_defconfig builds still seem OK.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: tip tree question
2009-10-12 3:56 linux-next: tip tree question Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-10-12 6:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-12 8:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-10-12 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, linux-next, LKML
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that the auto-latest branch of the tip tree (which is what
> is included in linux-next) has had the tip out-of-tree branch merged
> into it. [...]
That was unintended. tip:out-of-tree is like the tail section of -mm:
for useful but never-for-upstream patches.
Fixed it - thanks Stephen,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: tip tree question
2009-10-12 6:49 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-10-12 8:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-10-12 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, linux-next, LKML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 346 bytes --]
Hi Ingo,
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:49:44 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu> wrote:
>
> That was unintended. tip:out-of-tree is like the tail section of -mm:
> for useful but never-for-upstream patches.
>
> Fixed it
OK, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-12 8:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-12 3:56 linux-next: tip tree question Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-12 6:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-12 8:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox