public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail•com>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux•intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail•com>,
	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru•mvista.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:32:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091123163211.GB3491@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091123122606.GA3616@sortiz.org>

Hi Samuel,

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:35:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Samuel,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/power/pcf50633-charger.c: In function 'pcf50633_mbc_get_usb_online_status':
> > drivers/power/pcf50633-charger.c:147: error: 'struct pcf50633' has no member named 'mbc_pdev'
> > 
> > Caused by commit 4c2e3bacc050f0ebf884954bb007616c162564cd ("mfd: pcf50633
> > - fix error handling during probe") from the mfd tree interacting with
> > commit c329795052aa339850a45fab649ab97a36905136 ("pcf50633: Query charger
> > status directly") from the battery tree.
> Could we split the above fix so that we get back to the:
> 
> 	struct platform_device *rtc_pdev;
> 	struct platform_device *mbc_pdev;
> 	struct platform_device *adc_pdev;
> 	struct platform_device *input_pdev;
> 	struct platform_device *regulator_pdev[PCF50633_NUM_REGULATORS];
> 
> structure ? We can move to the index based structure after the next merge
> window. That would make my life easier in terms of tree dependencies.
> If you dont have time to do this change, I'll do it some time this week.
> 

Please feel free to drop or reschedule the patch as you see fit. I don't
have any problem if it will go in later.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-23 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-23  3:35 linux-next: mfd tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 12:26 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-11-23 16:32   ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2009-11-24 23:35     ` Samuel Ortiz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-19  4:06 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-19 10:59 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-01-19 11:34   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11  5:02 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11 10:51 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-11 12:02   ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-01-11 12:33     ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-01-11 22:44       ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24  5:37 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24  9:57 ` Mark Brown
2009-11-24 10:14   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24 10:40     ` Mark Brown
2009-11-23  3:41 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23  4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 12:29   ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-11-23 13:11     ` Mark Brown
2009-11-23 14:44       ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-11-23 15:20         ` Mark Brown
2009-10-06  2:02 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-06  2:35 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-06  3:54   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-06  4:19     ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-08  5:59       ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-12  2:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-12  3:03 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-12 10:07 ` Balaji Rao
2009-01-13  6:24   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-14 12:12   ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-08-05 14:08 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 15:39 ` ian
2008-08-05 16:05   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-05 18:50     ` ian
2008-08-05 16:05   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 16:08     ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-08-05 16:16       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 17:40         ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-08-05 18:46           ` ian
2008-08-06  9:53             ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-08-06  0:40           ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05  5:09 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 13:03 ` ian
2008-08-05 13:09   ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-08-05 13:22     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-05 15:29     ` ian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091123163211.GB3491@core.coreip.homeip.net \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=avorontsov@ru$(echo .)mvista.com \
    --cc=fercerpav@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox