public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat•com>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp•com>,
	Alex Chiang <achiang@hp•com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel•com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the acpi tree
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:34:08 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100224143408.69e0c889.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

Hi Dave,

Today's linux-next merge of the cpufreq tree got a conflict in
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c between commit
5f45c35d7ede1c00cbaa3b09b8a84c425af81c4b ("ACPI: processor: mv
processor_core.c processor_driver.c") from the acpi tree and commit
0f1d683fb35d6c6f49ef696c95757f3970682a0e ("[CPUFREQ] Processor Clocking
Control interface driver") from the cpufreq tree.

I applied the equivalent patch to processor_driver.c (see below) and can
carry this as necessary.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:29:12 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: merge fixup for processor_core.c rename

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
index 7e8e1ba..b5658cd 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
@@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ static const struct file_operations acpi_processor_info_fops = {
 #endif
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor *, processors);
+EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(processors);
+
 struct acpi_processor_errata errata __read_mostly;
 
 /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
1.7.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au

             reply	other threads:[~2010-02-24  3:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-24  3:34 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-12  2:45 linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the acpi tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12 12:15 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-11-12 17:13   ` Dave Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100224143408.69e0c889.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=achiang@hp$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davej@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=nagananda.chumbalkar@hp$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox