* linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the v9fs tree
@ 2010-04-28 3:24 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-04-28 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Sripathi Kodi, Eric Van Hensbergen
Hi Jens,
Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
fs/9p/vfs_super.c between commit 0b2d973241f9bdbc8ed62caec42543e00ae6bd1e
("9p: VFS switches for 9p2000.L: VFS switches") from the v9fs tree and
commit 0ed07ddb56d1348e5ce33f3b8de20d730351983a ("9p: add bdi backing to
mount session") from the block tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the
fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/9p/vfs_super.c
index 7c94cb0,806da5d..0000000
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_super.c
@@@ -77,10 -76,8 +77,11 @@@ v9fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb
sb->s_blocksize_bits = fls(v9ses->maxdata - 1);
sb->s_blocksize = 1 << sb->s_blocksize_bits;
sb->s_magic = V9FS_MAGIC;
- sb->s_op = &v9fs_super_ops;
+ if (v9fs_proto_dotl(v9ses))
+ sb->s_op = &v9fs_super_ops_dotl;
+ else
+ sb->s_op = &v9fs_super_ops;
+ sb->s_bdi = &v9ses->bdi;
sb->s_flags = flags | MS_ACTIVE | MS_SYNCHRONOUS | MS_DIRSYNC |
MS_NOATIME;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-04-28 3:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-28 3:24 linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the v9fs tree Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox