* Re: of: Make OF_DYNAMIC user selectable
@ 2014-07-27 23:35 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-27 23:51 ` Måns Rullgård
2014-08-11 14:28 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-07-27 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 336 bytes --]
Hi Grant,
I noticed the subject commit in the devicetree tree in linux-next today.
The commit message gives us no idea why we would want to make this
change. We already have lots of user selectable CONFIG_ options ... do
we really need this one as well?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: of: Make OF_DYNAMIC user selectable
2014-07-27 23:35 of: Make OF_DYNAMIC user selectable Stephen Rothwell
@ 2014-07-27 23:51 ` Måns Rullgård
2014-08-11 14:28 ` Grant Likely
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Måns Rullgård @ 2014-07-27 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Grant Likely, linux-next, linux-kernel
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi Grant,
>
> I noticed the subject commit in the devicetree tree in linux-next today.
> The commit message gives us no idea why we would want to make this
> change. We already have lots of user selectable CONFIG_ options ... do
> we really need this one as well?
You say that like user-selectable options are somehow evil. The kernel
is not Gnome.
--
Måns Rullgård
mans@mansr•com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: of: Make OF_DYNAMIC user selectable
2014-07-27 23:35 of: Make OF_DYNAMIC user selectable Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-27 23:51 ` Måns Rullgård
@ 2014-08-11 14:28 ` Grant Likely
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2014-08-11 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:35:26 +1000, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> I noticed the subject commit in the devicetree tree in linux-next today.
> The commit message gives us no idea why we would want to make this
> change. We already have lots of user selectable CONFIG_ options ... do
> we really need this one as well?
It was a mistake. That was a patch added for private testing that
accidentally made it out into my public tree. I'm not sending it to
Linus. Code depending on OF_DYNAMIC needs to select it.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-11 14:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-27 23:35 of: Make OF_DYNAMIC user selectable Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-27 23:51 ` Måns Rullgård
2014-08-11 14:28 ` Grant Likely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox