* linux-next: is the kgdb tree still relevant?
@ 2014-08-05 4:03 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-08-05 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wessel; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 236 bytes --]
Hi Jason,
I have noticed that the kgdb tree contains 10 commits the last of which
was committed on March 3, 2013. Should I drop this tree form
linux-next?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-08-05 4:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-05 4:03 linux-next: is the kgdb tree still relevant? Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox