public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat•com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat•com>, KVM <kvm@vger•kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro•org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:55:12 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180201125512.7bc96674@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:

  virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c

between commit:

  36e5cfd410ad ("KVM: arm/arm64: Properly handle arch-timer IRQs after vtimer_save_state")

from Linus' tree and commits:

  70450a9fbe06 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Don't cache the timer IRQ level")
  13e59ece5b30 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Fix incorrect timer_is_pending logic")

from the kvm tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
index cc29a8148328,fb6bd9b9845e..000000000000
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
@@@ -92,27 -92,18 +92,26 @@@ static irqreturn_t kvm_arch_timer_handl
  {
  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = *(struct kvm_vcpu **)dev_id;
  	struct arch_timer_context *vtimer;
 +	u32 cnt_ctl;
  
 -	if (!vcpu) {
 -		pr_warn_once("Spurious arch timer IRQ on non-VCPU thread\n");
 -		return IRQ_NONE;
 -	}
 +	/*
 +	 * We may see a timer interrupt after vcpu_put() has been called which
 +	 * sets the CPU's vcpu pointer to NULL, because even though the timer
 +	 * has been disabled in vtimer_save_state(), the hardware interrupt
 +	 * signal may not have been retired from the interrupt controller yet.
 +	 */
 +	if (!vcpu)
 +		return IRQ_HANDLED;
  
  	vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu);
- 	if (!vtimer->irq.level) {
- 		cnt_ctl = read_sysreg_el0(cntv_ctl);
- 		cnt_ctl &= ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE | ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_STAT |
- 			   ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_MASK;
- 		if (cnt_ctl == (ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE | ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_STAT))
- 			kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu, true, vtimer);
- 	}
- 
- 	if (unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)))
 -	if (kvm_timer_should_fire(vtimer))
++	cnt_ctl = read_sysreg_el0(cntv_ctl);
++	cnt_ctl &= ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE | ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_STAT |
++		   ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_MASK;
++	if (cnt_ctl == (ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE | ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_STAT))
+ 		kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu, true, vtimer);
+ 
+ 	if (static_branch_unlikely(&userspace_irqchip_in_use) &&
+ 	    unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)))
  		kvm_vtimer_update_mask_user(vcpu);
  
  	return IRQ_HANDLED;

             reply	other threads:[~2018-02-01  1:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-01  1:55 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2018-02-01 10:47 ` linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Christoffer Dall
2018-02-01 13:22   ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 14:05     ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-01 14:21     ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-01 15:22       ` Radim Krčmář
2018-02-01 15:30         ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-02  0:20         ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-02 17:22           ` Radim Krčmář
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-10  1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13  6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13  6:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-09  0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-13  3:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-30 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-22  4:29 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-17  2:56 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-02  2:36 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-02  8:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-02 10:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-24  2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17  1:16 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17  1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17  1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-04  2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-18  2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15  4:24 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15  4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06  5:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-04  7:04 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-05  2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-05  1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-25 21:07 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17  3:48 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 11:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 12:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 12:37         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:43       ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 12:53         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-29  4:02           ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-29 10:35             ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-25  4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04  6:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-27  4:50 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25  7:25 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09  6:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-02  5:05 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-02  5:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-01  2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-07  3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-02  5:52 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-12  4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-06  5:12 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-13  3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27  1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27 16:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-11-06  0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01  4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01  7:10 ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]   ` <4A4B1106.8000506@redhat.com>
2009-07-01 12:30     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-01 15:11       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-07-01 12:31     ` Gregory Haskins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180201125512.7bc96674@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro$(echo .)org \
    --cc=kvm@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox