From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat•com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat•com>, KVM <kvm@vger•kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 11:16:59 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190517111659.0abd4659@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 837 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c
between commit:
76d58e0f07ec ("KVM: fix KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG for memory slots of unaligned size")
from Linus' tree and commit:
65c4189de8c1 ("KVM: fix KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG for memory slots of unaligned size")
from the kvm tree.
I fixed it up (the only difference was a comment, so I just used the
former evrsion) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-17 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-17 1:16 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-10 1:31 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13 6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13 6:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-09 0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-13 3:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-30 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-22 4:29 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-17 2:56 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-02 2:36 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-02 8:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-02 10:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-24 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-04 2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-18 2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15 4:24 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15 4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06 5:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-04 7:04 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-05 2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-05 1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 10:47 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-01 13:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 14:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-01 14:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-01 15:22 ` Radim Krčmář
2018-02-01 15:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-02 0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-02 17:22 ` Radim Krčmář
2018-01-25 21:07 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 3:48 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 11:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 12:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 12:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 12:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-29 4:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-29 10:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-25 4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04 6:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-27 4:50 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25 7:25 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09 6:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-02 5:05 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-02 5:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-01 2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-07 3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-02 5:52 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-12 4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-06 5:12 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-13 3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27 1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27 16:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-11-06 0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01 7:10 ` Davide Libenzi
[not found] ` <4A4B1106.8000506@redhat.com>
2009-07-01 12:30 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-01 15:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-07-01 12:31 ` Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190517111659.0abd4659@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=kvm@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox