public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor•apana.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Networking <netdev@vger•kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel•org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the net-next tree
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:22:53 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180730132253.33633f56@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 992 bytes --]

Hi Herbert,

Today's linux-next merge of the crypto tree got conflicts in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fec.c

between commits:

  16f6e9835bcd ("net: ethernet: freescale: Use generic CRC32 implementation")
  d805f6a86829 ("net: ethernet: fs-enet: Use generic CRC32 implementation")

from the net-next tree and commit:

  5d258b48efbd ("net: ethernet: Use existing define with polynomial")

from the crypto tree.

I fixed it up (I used the net-next tree versions (but kept the rmeoval
of the CRC32_POLY and FEC_CRC_POLY defines) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2018-07-30  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-30  3:22 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2018-07-31  6:24 ` linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the net-next tree Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-08-15  3:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-30  0:42 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-30  0:49 ` Herbert Xu
2020-03-30 15:35   ` Ayush Sawal
2018-01-25 10:52 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-07  2:18 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-07 11:08 ` David Howells
2016-03-08  5:56   ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-08 16:48     ` David Howells
2016-03-08 21:22       ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-06  2:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-06  5:45 ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180730132253.33633f56@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor$(echo .)apana.org.au \
    --cc=krzk@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox