public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse•cz>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse•cz>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel•org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel•org>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse•com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda•com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the btrfs tree
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 07:53:46 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240109075346.0e1ac96b@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231130075021.27851843@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3558 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:50:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 12:09:30 +0100 Jan Kara <jack@suse•cz> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue 28-11-23 14:33:44, Nathan Chancellor wrote:  
> > > Hi Stephen (and other maintainers),
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 09:20:01AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:    
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
> > > > 
> > > >   fs/btrfs/super.c
> > > > 
> > > > between commit:
> > > > 
> > > >   2f2cfead5107 ("btrfs: remove old mount API code")
> > > > 
> > > > from the btrfs tree and commit:
> > > > 
> > > >   ead622674df5 ("btrfs: Do not restrict writes to btrfs devices")
> > > > 
> > > > from the vfs-brauner tree.
> > > > 
> > > > I fixed it up (the former removed the funtion updated by the latter, but
> > > > a further fix may be required to implement the intent of the latter?)    
> > > 
> > > Yes, the lack of ead622674df5 appears to cause issues with mounting
> > > btrfs volumes on at least next-20231128 due to the presence of commit
> > > 6f861765464f ("fs: Block writes to mounted block devices"). In QEMU, I
> > > can see:
> > > 
> > >   :: running early hook [udev]
> > >   Warning: /lib/modules/6.7.0-rc3-next-20231128/modules.devname not found - ignoring
> > >   Starting systemd-udevd version 252.5-1-arch
> > >   :: running hook [udev]
> > >   :: Triggering uevents...
> > >   :: running hook [keymap]
> > >   :: Loading keymap...kbd_mode: KDSKBMODE: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> > >   done.
> > >   :: performing fsck on '/dev/vda2'
> > >   :: mounting '/dev/vda2' on real root
> > >   mount: /new_root: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/vda2, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
> > >          dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
> > >   You are now being dropped into an emergency shell.
> > >   sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
> > >   [rootfs ]#
> > > 
> > > The following diff allows my VM to boot properly but I am not sure if
> > > there is a better or more proper fix (I am already out of my element
> > > heh). If a proper merge solution cannot be found quickly, can
> > > 6f861765464f be reverted in the meantime so that all my machines with
> > > btrfs can boot properly? :)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> > > index 99d10a25a579..23db0306b8ef 100644
> > > --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> > > @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static int btrfs_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc,
> > >  	case Opt_device: {
> > >  		struct btrfs_device *device;
> > >  		blk_mode_t mode = sb_open_mode(fc->sb_flags);
> > > +		mode &= ~BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES;
> > >  
> > >  		mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
> > >  		device = btrfs_scan_one_device(param->string, mode, false);
> > > @@ -1801,6 +1802,8 @@ static int btrfs_get_tree_super(struct fs_context *fc)
> > >  	blk_mode_t mode = sb_open_mode(fc->sb_flags);
> > >  	int ret;
> > >  
> > > +	mode &= ~BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES;
> > > +
> > >  	btrfs_ctx_to_info(fs_info, ctx);
> > >  	mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);    
> > 
> > This looks like the proper resolution. Basically btrfs needs to strip
> > BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES from the mode provided by sb_open_mode(). Thanks
> > for writing it!  
> 
> I have added this patch as a merge fix from today.

This is now a conflict between the btrfs tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-08 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-26 22:20 linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the btrfs tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-28 21:33 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-11-29 11:09   ` Jan Kara
2023-11-29 20:50     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-08 20:53       ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-02 21:58 Stephen Rothwell
2025-12-02  0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-31 22:22 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-15 21:51 Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-18 22:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-06-18 11:41 Mark Brown
2024-07-16  0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-03  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-14  1:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-30 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2023-12-06 23:32 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-08 20:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-26 22:14 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-08 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-09 16:15 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-10 21:37   ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-11  0:24     ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-11  9:20     ` David Sterba
2023-10-12 15:42       ` David Sterba
2023-10-23 17:55         ` David Sterba
2023-10-23 21:25           ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-24 15:32             ` David Sterba
2023-10-25  0:09               ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-15  1:20 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240109075346.0e1ac96b@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=brauner@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse$(echo .)com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse$(echo .)cz \
    --cc=jack@suse$(echo .)cz \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox