public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel•org>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse•cz>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse•com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel•org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the btrfs tree
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:51:29 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241016085129.3954241d@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1709 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:

  fs/btrfs/file.c

between commit:

  377781e9e6f8 ("btrfs: drop unused parameter iov_iter from btrfs_write_check()")

from the btrfs tree and commit:

  e2e801d6e625 ("btrfs: convert to multigrain timestamps")

from the vfs-brauner tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/btrfs/file.c
index 033f85ea8c9d,e5384ceb8acf..000000000000
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@@ -1124,27 -1120,7 +1124,7 @@@ void btrfs_check_nocow_unlock(struct bt
  	btrfs_drew_write_unlock(&inode->root->snapshot_lock);
  }
  
- static void update_time_for_write(struct inode *inode)
- {
- 	struct timespec64 now, ts;
- 
- 	if (IS_NOCMTIME(inode))
- 		return;
- 
- 	now = current_time(inode);
- 	ts = inode_get_mtime(inode);
- 	if (!timespec64_equal(&ts, &now))
- 		inode_set_mtime_to_ts(inode, now);
- 
- 	ts = inode_get_ctime(inode);
- 	if (!timespec64_equal(&ts, &now))
- 		inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, now);
- 
- 	if (IS_I_VERSION(inode))
- 		inode_inc_iversion(inode);
- }
- 
 -int btrfs_write_check(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from, size_t count)
 +int btrfs_write_check(struct kiocb *iocb, size_t count)
  {
  	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-15 21:51 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2024-11-18 22:16 ` linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the btrfs tree Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-02 21:58 Stephen Rothwell
2025-12-02  0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-31 22:22 Stephen Rothwell
2024-06-18 11:41 Mark Brown
2024-07-16  0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-03  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-14  1:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-30 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2023-12-06 23:32 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-08 20:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-26 22:20 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-28 21:33 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-11-29 11:09   ` Jan Kara
2023-11-29 20:50     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-08 20:53       ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-26 22:14 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-08 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-09 16:15 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-10 21:37   ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-11  0:24     ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-11  9:20     ` David Sterba
2023-10-12 15:42       ` David Sterba
2023-10-23 17:55         ` David Sterba
2023-10-23 21:25           ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-24 15:32             ` David Sterba
2023-10-25  0:09               ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-15  1:20 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241016085129.3954241d@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=brauner@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse$(echo .)com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse$(echo .)cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox