public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>
To: Brahmajit Das <brahmajit.xyz@gmail•com>
Cc: david@redhat•com, gorcunov@openvz•org, linux-next@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] fs: proc: Fix build with GCC 15 due to -Werror=unterminated-string-initialization
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 14:48:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241002144806.255d62115286e173bbf42655@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241002080914.841071-1-brahmajit.xyz@gmail.com>

On Wed,  2 Oct 2024 13:39:14 +0530 Brahmajit Das <brahmajit.xyz@gmail•com> wrote:

> GCC 15 enables -Werror=unterminated-string-initialization by default.
> This results in the following build error/s
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
>   917 |                 [0 ... (BITS_PER_LONG-1)] = "??",
>       |                                                 ^~~~
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> ...
> 
> To fix this, the length of the second argument of arary mnemonics needs

"array"

> to be 3 instead of previously set 2 (i.e. from [BITS_PER_LONG][2] to
> [BITS_PER_LONG][3])
> 

Yes, I'm not surprised that little party trick we used in there fools
gcc.  And really it deserves to die.

> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -909,8 +909,15 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * Don't forget to update Documentation/ on changes.
> +	 *
> +	 * The length of the second argument of arary mnemonics

"array".  But really, just using "mnemonics[]" conveys all we need.

> +	 * needs to be 3 instead of previously set 2
> +	 * (i.e. from [BITS_PER_LONG][2] to [BITS_PER_LONG][3])
> +	 * to avoid spurious
> +	 * -Werror=unterminated-string-initialization warning
> +	 *  with GCC 15
>  	 */
> -	static const char mnemonics[BITS_PER_LONG][2] = {
> +	static const char mnemonics[BITS_PER_LONG][3] = {
>  		/*
>  		 * In case if we meet a flag we don't know about.
>  		 */

If we want to preserve the party trick then perhaps we can use

-                [0 ... (BITS_PER_LONG-1)] = { "??" },
+                [0 ... (BITS_PER_LONG-1)] = { '?', '?' },

and this will shut gcc up?

If we do remove the party trick (as you have done) then this:

		if (vma->vm_flags & (1UL << i)) {
			seq_putc(m, mnemonics[i][0]);
			seq_putc(m, mnemonics[i][1]);
			seq_putc(m, ' ');
		}

can be simplified (and probably sped up) with

		
		if (vma->vm_flags & (1UL << i))
			seq_printf(m, "%s ", mnemonics[i]);

yes?


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-02 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-02  8:05 [PATCH 1/1] fs: proc: Fix build with GCC 15 due to -Werror=unterminated-string-initialization Brahmajit Das
2024-10-02  8:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Brahmajit Das
2024-10-02 21:48   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-10-02 23:30     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-02 23:39     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-04 20:16     ` Brahmajit
2024-10-04 21:12     ` Brahmajit
2024-10-04 21:58       ` Andrew Morton
2024-10-05  6:37         ` [PATCH v3 1/1] fs/proc: " Brahmajit Das
2024-10-08  2:08           ` Andrew Morton
2024-10-28  8:02             ` Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241002144806.255d62115286e173bbf42655@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=brahmajit.xyz@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=david@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox