* linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with the mm-stable tree
@ 2024-11-13 23:16 Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-20 1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-11-13 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Christian Borntraeger,
Andrew Morton
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List,
Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1791 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the s390 tree got a conflict in:
arch/s390/mm/pageattr.c
between commit:
0c6378a71574 ("arch: introduce set_direct_map_valid_noflush()")
from the mm-stable tree and commit:
2835f8bf5530 ("s390/pageattr: Implement missing kernel_page_present()")
from the s390 tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/s390/mm/pageattr.c
index 4c7ee74aa130,4a0f422cfeb6..000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/mm/pageattr.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/pageattr.c
@@@ -406,17 -407,21 +407,33 @@@ int set_direct_map_default_noflush(stru
return __set_memory((unsigned long)page_to_virt(page), 1, SET_MEMORY_DEF);
}
+int set_direct_map_valid_noflush(struct page *page, unsigned nr, bool valid)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (valid)
+ flags = SET_MEMORY_DEF;
+ else
+ flags = SET_MEMORY_INV;
+
+ return __set_memory((unsigned long)page_to_virt(page), nr, flags);
+}
++
+ bool kernel_page_present(struct page *page)
+ {
+ unsigned long addr;
+ unsigned int cc;
+
+ addr = (unsigned long)page_address(page);
+ asm volatile(
+ " lra %[addr],0(%[addr])\n"
+ CC_IPM(cc)
+ : CC_OUT(cc, cc), [addr] "+a" (addr)
+ :
+ : CC_CLOBBER);
+ return CC_TRANSFORM(cc) == 0;
+ }
+
#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_KFENCE)
static void ipte_range(pte_t *pte, unsigned long address, int nr)
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with the mm-stable tree
2024-11-13 23:16 linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with the mm-stable tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2024-11-20 1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-11-20 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Christian Borntraeger,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List,
Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2069 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:16:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the s390 tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/s390/mm/pageattr.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 0c6378a71574 ("arch: introduce set_direct_map_valid_noflush()")
>
> from the mm-stable tree and commit:
>
> 2835f8bf5530 ("s390/pageattr: Implement missing kernel_page_present()")
>
> from the s390 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc arch/s390/mm/pageattr.c
> index 4c7ee74aa130,4a0f422cfeb6..000000000000
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/pageattr.c
> @@@ -406,17 -407,21 +407,33 @@@ int set_direct_map_default_noflush(stru
> return __set_memory((unsigned long)page_to_virt(page), 1, SET_MEMORY_DEF);
> }
>
> +int set_direct_map_valid_noflush(struct page *page, unsigned nr, bool valid)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if (valid)
> + flags = SET_MEMORY_DEF;
> + else
> + flags = SET_MEMORY_INV;
> +
> + return __set_memory((unsigned long)page_to_virt(page), nr, flags);
> +}
> ++
> + bool kernel_page_present(struct page *page)
> + {
> + unsigned long addr;
> + unsigned int cc;
> +
> + addr = (unsigned long)page_address(page);
> + asm volatile(
> + " lra %[addr],0(%[addr])\n"
> + CC_IPM(cc)
> + : CC_OUT(cc, cc), [addr] "+a" (addr)
> + :
> + : CC_CLOBBER);
> + return CC_TRANSFORM(cc) == 0;
> + }
> +
> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_KFENCE)
>
> static void ipte_range(pte_t *pte, unsigned long address, int nr)
This is now a conflict between the mm-stable tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-20 1:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-13 23:16 linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with the mm-stable tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-20 1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox