From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat•com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox•com>
Cc: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich•ibm.com>,
Junxian Huang <huangjunxian6@hisilicon•com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel•org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
Yuyu Li <liyuyu6@huawei•com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with Linus' tree
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:13:07 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250106111307.7d0f55ba@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 838 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
between commit:
16b87037b488 ("RDMA/siw: Remove direct link to net_device")
from Linus' tree and commit:
62f5d59d1a3d ("RDMA/siw: Remove deliver net device event")
from the rdma tree.
I fixed it up (I used the former version of siw_verbs.c and the
superset parts of siw_main.c) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-06 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-06 0:13 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2025-01-14 20:48 ` linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with Linus' tree Jason Gunthorpe
2025-01-14 21:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-15 0:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-01-15 1:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-15 11:17 ` Bernard Metzler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-11 2:23 Stephen Rothwell
2025-09-11 11:03 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-05-14 2:24 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-14 8:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-22 4:30 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-20 1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-20 6:35 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-01-05 23:51 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-06 1:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-06 14:16 ` Zhu Yanjun
2023-06-22 1:52 Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-21 0:34 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-15 2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-10 2:15 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-10 18:57 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-02-10 20:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-10 22:08 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-02-11 20:03 ` Martin Wilck
2019-11-05 1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-05 2:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-05 2:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-24 0:01 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-28 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-20 3:25 ` Doug Ledford
2019-06-20 2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-20 3:24 ` Doug Ledford
2019-06-14 3:00 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-14 13:11 ` Doug Ledford
2018-09-28 0:01 Stephen Rothwell
2018-09-29 2:57 ` Parav Pandit
2018-08-06 2:01 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06 19:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-06 21:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-08 2:11 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-14 1:14 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-14 1:17 ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-14 3:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-07-14 3:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-14 4:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-07-14 12:03 ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-14 13:46 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-07-14 4:12 ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-14 4:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-07-14 14:33 ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-14 15:10 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-12-15 0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-10 0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-10 0:54 Stephen Rothwell
2016-08-05 1:05 Stephen Rothwell
2016-08-05 1:01 Stephen Rothwell
2016-08-05 0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-19 1:45 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-22 0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-22 0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-22 0:24 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-22 0:17 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-01 7:48 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-02 10:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250106111307.7d0f55ba@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=bmt@zurich$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=huangjunxian6@hisilicon$(echo .)com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox$(echo .)com \
--cc=leon@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=liyuyu6@huawei$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox