public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel•org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat•com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation•org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
	Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@amd•com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:42:46 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250722114246.2c683a44@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 808 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-ptp.c

between commit:

  fbd47be098b5 ("amd-xgbe: add hardware PTP timestamping support")

from the net-next tree and commit:

  e78f70bad29c ("time/timecounter: Fix the lie that struct cyclecounter is const")

from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (the former removed the function updated by the latter) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2025-07-22  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-22  1:42 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2025-07-29 23:21 ` linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-04  6:28 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-07  2:49 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-07  6:06 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-05-28  6:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-28  4:43 Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-28 21:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-26  5:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-15  2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-10  1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-18  2:31 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-18  5:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-02-15  2:20 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-01  7:15 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-01  8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-01  8:27   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-01  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-01  9:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-01 10:57       ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-01  7:10 Stephen Rothwell
2017-10-30 20:55 Mark Brown
2017-11-13  6:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-31  3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-05  0:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-20  1:22 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-20  9:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-12-12  2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-01  3:46 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-17  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07  7:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07  7:32 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-07 16:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-04-07  7:04 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07 16:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-04-07  7:00 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07  7:30 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-07-25  4:38 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-05  4:29 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13  3:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13  3:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-14  3:02   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-14  4:51     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-14  5:19       ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-14  5:19       ` David Miller
2014-01-14  5:44         ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-14  5:48           ` David Miller
2014-01-14  6:10             ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08  4:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-11  4:03 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250722114246.2c683a44@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=Raju.Rangoju@amd$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox