public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin•com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel•org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions•net>,
	Wireless <linux-wireless@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:44:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <317b515f-30fb-4b18-bb99-b65091449ec4@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tti6qt5o.fsf@kernel.org>

Hello Kalle, Stephen,

On 6/6/24 12:09, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel•org> writes:
> 
>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in:
>>>
>>>   drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/netdev.c
>>>
>>> between commit:
>>>
>>>   ebfb5e8fc8b4 ("Revert "wifi: wilc1000: convert list management to RCU"")
>>>
>>> from the wireless tree and commit:
>>>
>>>   6fe46d5c0a84 ("wifi: wilc1000: set net device registration as last
>>> step during interface creation")
>>>
>>> from the wireless-next tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>>> complex conflicts.
>>
>> Thanks. We need to figure out how we solve this conflict, most probably
>> we'll ask network maintainers to fix it when they pull wireless-next.
> 
> Alexis, you know wilc1000 the best. Could you double check the conflict
> resolution, it somewhat complicated:>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240603110023.23572803@canb.auug.org.au/
> 

LGTM, and some quick testing on the linux-next tree with the corresponding merge
commit showed no issue (no RCU warning, and mac address loading fix behaving
properly)

Alexis

-- 
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-07  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-03  1:01 linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-06-03 10:01 ` Kalle Valo
2024-06-06 10:09   ` Kalle Valo
2024-06-07  9:44     ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]
2024-06-07 10:29       ` Kalle Valo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-16  3:52 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-16  8:59 ` Johannes Berg
2025-07-16 11:54   ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-16 17:18   ` Jeff Johnson
2024-10-28  1:36 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-28  6:51 ` Johannes Berg
2024-10-31  2:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-24  0:55 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-24  6:58 ` Johannes Berg
2024-10-31  2:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-31  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-22  0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-25 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-26  7:58 ` Johannes Berg
2024-02-08 23:56 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-09  7:03 ` Johannes Berg
2023-09-26  2:20 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-26  2:02 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-26  2:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-26  6:21   ` Johannes Berg
2023-09-12  2:46 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-30 23:49 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-31  9:17 ` Johannes Berg
2023-04-03  2:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-03  8:43   ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-25  3:36 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-03  0:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-03 15:52 ` John W. Linville
2013-12-03 16:09   ` Johannes Berg
2013-12-03 18:12     ` Bob Copeland
2013-12-04  1:21       ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2013-08-19  2:41 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-12  1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-12 15:15 ` John W. Linville
2013-08-12 15:34   ` Berg, Johannes
2013-06-07  2:56 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-07  6:21 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-03-26  1:18 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-12  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-15  2:17 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-15  8:06 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-10-22  0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-22  0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-14  0:53 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=317b515f-30fb-4b18-bb99-b65091449ec4@bootlin.com \
    --to=alexis.lothore@bootlin$(echo .)com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions$(echo .)net \
    --cc=kvalo@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox