From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions•net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel•org>,
Wireless <linux-wireless@vger•kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:21:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de13abae1708985a88a702e1690cfb883ae11dfa.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230926124111.29103070@canb.auug.org.au>
On Tue, 2023-09-26 at 12:41 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:02:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got conflicts in:
> >
> > net/mac80211/cfg.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 31db78a4923e ("wifi: mac80211: fix potential key use-after-free")
> >
> > from the wireless tree and commit:
> >
> > 4d3acf4311a0 ("wifi: mac80211: remove sta_mtx")
> >
> > from the wireless-next tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
>
> That wasn't quite right. The final resolution is below.
Thanks Stephen, also for the other one!
I knew about the new ones as well but forgot to give you a heads-up, my
bad, I'm sorry.
I'm planning to submit a wireless pull request today or tomorrow, and
then merge back into wireless-next once it settles in, so this should
hopefully be resolved by the end of the week or so.
Thanks,
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 2:02 linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-26 2:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-26 6:21 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-16 3:52 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-16 8:59 ` Johannes Berg
2025-07-16 11:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-16 17:18 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-10-28 1:36 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-28 6:51 ` Johannes Berg
2024-10-31 2:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-24 0:55 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-24 6:58 ` Johannes Berg
2024-10-31 2:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-06-03 1:01 Stephen Rothwell
2024-06-03 10:01 ` Kalle Valo
2024-06-06 10:09 ` Kalle Valo
2024-06-07 9:44 ` Alexis Lothoré
2024-06-07 10:29 ` Kalle Valo
2024-05-31 2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-22 0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-25 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-26 7:58 ` Johannes Berg
2024-02-08 23:56 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-09 7:03 ` Johannes Berg
2023-09-26 2:20 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-12 2:46 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-30 23:49 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-31 9:17 ` Johannes Berg
2023-04-03 2:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-03 8:43 ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-25 3:36 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-03 0:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-03 15:52 ` John W. Linville
2013-12-03 16:09 ` Johannes Berg
2013-12-03 18:12 ` Bob Copeland
2013-12-04 1:21 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2013-08-19 2:41 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-12 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-12 15:15 ` John W. Linville
2013-08-12 15:34 ` Berg, Johannes
2013-06-07 2:56 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-07 6:21 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-03-26 1:18 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-12 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-15 2:17 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-15 8:06 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-10-22 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-22 0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-14 0:53 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de13abae1708985a88a702e1690cfb883ae11dfa.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions$(echo .)net \
--cc=kvalo@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox