* next-0702: ACPI Error (nseval-0159): Insufficient arguments
@ 2008-07-03 13:07 Alexander Beregalov
2008-07-03 13:48 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2008-07-03 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ak, lenb, linux-acpi, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-next
Hi
I have several these messages.
It is Dual-Core Opteron 1214.
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=y
CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
Let me know if you need more info.
[ 0.888708] WARNING: at nseval:159 acpi_ut_error+0x32/0xa2()
[ 0.888708] Modules linked in:
[ 0.888708] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26-rc8-next-20080702 #1
[ 0.888708]
[ 0.888708] Call Trace:
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8022f47b>] warn_on_slowpath+0x58/0x87
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8024ea02>] ? __lock_acquire+0xd25/0xd71
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8027f79e>] ? check_bytes_and_report+0x38/0xcb
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff803606c8>] ? acpi_ns_get_node+0x94/0xa4
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8027fbf5>] ? check_object+0x15a/0x245
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8027f483>] ? init_object+0x6e/0x77
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8024d875>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff80366be9>] acpi_ut_error+0x32/0xa2
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8024d875>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff803606c8>] ? acpi_ns_get_node+0x94/0xa4
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff803606c8>] ? acpi_ns_get_node+0x94/0xa4
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8024d83d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf9/0x124
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8024d875>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff80367740>] ?
acpi_ut_copy_eobject_to_iobject+0x18c/0x20a
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff803668f1>] ? acpi_ut_valid_acpi_name+0x1f/0x3c
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8035fefe>] acpi_ns_evaluate+0x10e/0x1b4
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8035fa4e>] acpi_evaluate_object+0x136/0x1f4
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8027fbf5>] ? check_object+0x15a/0x245
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8034d710>] acpi_run_osc+0xa5/0x16b
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8034d866>] pci_osc_control_set+0x90/0xa7
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff80349446>] aer_osc_setup+0x66/0xbc
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff80348533>] aer_init+0x9/0x1f
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff80469042>] aer_probe+0x13/0x16d
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff80347d0a>] pcie_port_probe_service+0x3a/0x84
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8038ed99>] driver_probe_device+0xd9/0x169
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8038ee78>] __driver_attach+0x4f/0x79
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8038ee29>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x79
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8038e3e8>] bus_for_each_dev+0x4d/0x7e
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8038ebc7>] driver_attach+0x1c/0x1e
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8038e876>] bus_add_driver+0xba/0x210
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff805f2ec2>] ? aer_service_init+0x0/0x20
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8038f056>] driver_register+0x93/0x10a
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff805f2ec2>] ? aer_service_init+0x0/0x20
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff803477eb>] pcie_port_service_register+0x47/0x49
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff805f2ee0>] aer_service_init+0x1e/0x20
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff805e0963>] kernel_init+0x142/0x29d
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8024d83d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf9/0x124
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8024d875>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8046f968>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x31
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8046f30e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8024d83d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf9/0x124
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8020c0a8>] child_rip+0xa/0x12
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8020b7bf>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff805e0821>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x29d
[ 0.888708] [<ffffffff8020c09e>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x12
[ 0.888708]
[ 0.888708] ---[ end trace a7919e7f17c0a725 ]---
[ 0.888708] ACPI Error (nseval-0159): Insufficient arguments -
method [_OSC] needs 5, found 4 [20080609]
[ 0.888708] aer 0000:00:0a.0:pcie01: AER service couldn't init
device: _OSC failed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: next-0702: ACPI Error (nseval-0159): Insufficient arguments
2008-07-03 13:07 next-0702: ACPI Error (nseval-0159): Insufficient arguments Alexander Beregalov
@ 2008-07-03 13:48 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-03 13:59 ` Alexander Beregalov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2008-07-03 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Beregalov
Cc: lenb, linux-acpi, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-next, akpm
Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have several these messages.
> It is Dual-Core Opteron 1214.
>
> CONFIG_ACPI=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
> CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
> CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
>
> Let me know if you need more info.
>
> [ 0.888708] WARNING: at nseval:159 acpi_ut_error+0x32/0xa2()
Andrew, that's the bad side effect I talked about earlier. Now the
warning doesn't report the right place, but just the error function
and it's unclear who causes it due to the unreliable backtrace.
Alexander,
Is this something that you didn't see in older kernels? If yes when did
it start?
Can you please file a full report in http://bugzilla.kernel.org?
Thanks,
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-03 14:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-03 13:07 next-0702: ACPI Error (nseval-0159): Insufficient arguments Alexander Beregalov
2008-07-03 13:48 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-03 13:59 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-07-03 14:18 ` Alexander Beregalov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox