public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat•com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel•org>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat•com>, KVM <kvm@vger•kernel.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm tree
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 07:37:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABgObfbCg1wiZJmnXFihmRLvPiJq2bCQH3MNVMfiUJphz4JW3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250528152832.3ce43330@canb.auug.org.au>

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 7:28 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kvm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> error[E0425]: cannot find function `mutex_trylock` in crate `bindings`
>    --> rust/kernel/sync/lock/mutex.rs:129:41
>     |
> 129 |         let result = unsafe { bindings::mutex_trylock(ptr) };
>     |                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: a function with a similar name exists: `mutex_lock`
>     |
>    ::: /home/sfr/next/x86_64_allmodconfig/rust/bindings/bindings_helpers_generated.rs:265:5
>     |
> 265 |     pub fn mutex_lock(lock: *mut mutex);
>     |     ------------------------------------ similarly named function `mutex_lock` defined here
>
> error: aborting due to 1 previous error

I thought that since Rust failures wouldn't have to be fixed by
non-Rust maintainers, they wouldn't block merging of non-Rust trees in
linux-next?

In this case it's not a problem to fix it up at all (I'll send a patch
to Miguel as soon as I've taken the little guy to school); it's just
to understand what's to expect.

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-28  5:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-28  5:28 linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-28  5:37 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2025-05-28  6:44   ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-02  6:47 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-12  3:34 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-12  3:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-12 12:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-22  2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-20  4:22 Stephen Rothwell
2023-12-11  2:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-19  5:34 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-19 16:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-19 16:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-21 18:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-27  3:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-27  6:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-08  5:33 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-08 11:18 ` Yu Zhang
2021-02-05  5:02 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-05 10:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-07 19:48   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-09  4:56     ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-17  5:57 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-29  7:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-21  6:28 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-04  2:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-18  3:42 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-19 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-02-19 18:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-12-19  4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-08  3:23 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-19  1:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-08  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-08  2:10 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-09-08  9:24   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-29  7:36 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-29  7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-29 12:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-24  6:19 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-24  9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-06  4:39 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-11 23:55 Mark Brown
2014-01-10  3:00 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-17  4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-23  3:21 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-06  4:53 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-06 10:34 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-30  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-30 10:03 ` Alexander Graf
2010-08-30 10:56   ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABgObfbCg1wiZJmnXFihmRLvPiJq2bCQH3MNVMfiUJphz4JW3g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kvm@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox