* Missing signoff in the edac tree
@ 2026-05-29 21:57 Mark Brown
2026-05-29 22:07 ` Luck, Tony
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2026-05-29 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Borislav Petkov, Tony Luck
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-next
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 141 bytes --]
Commit
3b48fd01d94cd ("EDAC: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers")
is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* RE: Missing signoff in the edac tree
2026-05-29 21:57 Missing signoff in the edac tree Mark Brown
@ 2026-05-29 22:07 ` Luck, Tony
2026-06-01 18:14 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Luck, Tony @ 2026-05-29 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Borislav Petkov
Cc: linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, linux-next@vger•kernel.org
> Commit
>
> 3b48fd01d94cd ("EDAC: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer
Boris pointed this out to me earlier today. Updated that commit (top one in edac-drivers branch)
New SHA1:
78d86a71de6e ("EDAC: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers")
-Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Missing signoff in the edac tree
2026-05-29 22:07 ` Luck, Tony
@ 2026-06-01 18:14 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-01 18:20 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2026-06-01 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luck, Tony
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Borislav Petkov,
linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, linux-next@vger•kernel.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 544 bytes --]
On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 10:07:35PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Commit
> > 3b48fd01d94cd ("EDAC: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers")
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer
> Boris pointed this out to me earlier today. Updated that commit (top one in edac-drivers branch)
> New SHA1:
> 78d86a71de6e ("EDAC: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers")
I'm still seeing the old merge in the history (8b3604b9e3eb47df), the
new one is there too. Probably fine but that's up to Linus.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Missing signoff in the edac tree
2026-06-01 18:14 ` Mark Brown
@ 2026-06-01 18:20 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2026-06-01 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: Luck, Tony, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org
On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> I'm still seeing the old merge in the history (8b3604b9e3eb47df), the
> new one is there too. Probably fine but that's up to Linus.
That's fine. We merge the branches afresh before sending them to Linus so
he'll see the fixed variant.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-01 18:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-29 21:57 Missing signoff in the edac tree Mark Brown
2026-05-29 22:07 ` Luck, Tony
2026-06-01 18:14 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-01 18:20 ` Borislav Petkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox