public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom•gr>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades•com>
Cc: "Smith, Craig" <craig.d.smith@siemens•com>,
	paulus@samba•org,
	linux-ppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:05:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4242C919.5050303@intracom.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050323160544.GB5305@logos.cnet>

Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:12:11AM -0500, Dan Malek wrote:
> 
>>On Mar 23, 2005, at 5:25 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You misunderstood: get_mmu_context() _wont_ be called if the mm 
>>>structures
>>>are the same.
>>
>>I understood.  At most, get_mmu_context() will only do a 'tlbia'
>>instruction, I didn't see your reason for thinking this would have
>>an effect on the tlbie usage.
> 
> 
> OK. That is not a good reason, indeed.
> 
> 
>>>>Well, that's interesting.  It's likely to only happen on an 860 
>>>>variant
>>>>that
>>>>has the large TLB.
>>>
>>>For what reasoning?
>>
>>My initial debugging seemed to indicate a stale TLB entry.  With
>>the larger TLB this is more likely to happen.  The bug was never
>>seen on the 823/850 with smaller TLBs.
>>
>>I have a new 8xx board now, so I'll have to start working on these
>>issues as well.
> 
> 
> OK!

I've just managed to get 2.6.12-rc1 running on my 870 based board
and the tlb invalidate is still needed.

Investigating...

Regards

Pantelis

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-24 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-21 11:59 Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status Smith, Craig
2004-09-21 11:53 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-21 16:54   ` Dan Malek
2004-09-21 17:03 ` Dan Malek
2004-09-22 11:09   ` Sam Song
2004-10-15 15:49   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-16  2:13     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-16  9:08       ` Sam Song
2004-10-18  5:59         ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-10-18  6:22           ` Sam Song
2004-10-18  3:10     ` Dan Malek
2005-02-10 15:04   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-10 19:26     ` Dan Malek
2005-02-10 17:06       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-10 17:08         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-21 21:45           ` Guillaume Autran
2005-03-21 21:53             ` Robert P. J. Day
2005-03-22 13:04             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-22 20:57               ` Dan Malek
2005-03-22 17:58                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-22 22:53                   ` Dan Malek
2005-03-23 10:25                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-23 16:12                       ` Dan Malek
2005-03-23 16:05                         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-24 14:05                           ` Pantelis Antoniou [this message]
2005-03-23 14:06                   ` Guillaume Autran
2005-02-11  3:42         ` Dan Malek
2005-02-21 21:12       ` Armin Schindler
2005-02-21 23:45         ` Guillaume Autran
2005-02-15  9:39     ` Reading of RTC robin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-22 11:20 Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status Joakim Tjernlund
2004-10-25 15:00 Sam Song
2004-09-17 13:57 Smith, Craig
2004-09-17 13:50 ` Pantelis Antoniou
     [not found] <20040916201505.E723B2BDB2@ozlabs.org>
2004-09-17 10:06 ` Song Sam
2004-09-17  9:55   ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-18 20:11     ` Song Sam
2004-09-20  6:02       ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-20 11:47         ` Song Sam
2004-09-20 17:49     ` Tom Rini
2004-09-20 18:02       ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-09-20 18:17         ` Tom Rini
2004-09-21  1:38       ` Song Sam
2004-09-21  6:12         ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-21 10:35           ` Song Sam
2004-09-21 10:41             ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-10-15 15:47               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-16 18:56 Smith, Craig
2004-09-16 20:07 ` Dan Malek
2004-09-17  5:43   ` Pantelis Antoniou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4242C919.5050303@intracom.gr \
    --to=panto@intracom$(echo .)gr \
    --cc=craig.d.smith@siemens$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades$(echo .)com \
    --cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox