RE : Re: mcpu options for AMCC440 with fpu

From: Patrice Bouchand <pb_fwd_list@yahoo•fr>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
Subject: RE : Re: mcpu options for AMCC440 with fpu
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:57:59 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <447407.61964.qm@web23402.mail.ird.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070221223543.64d584d7.mh@omnisys.se>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4411 bytes --]

Thanks for your answer but unfortunately, it makes just the thing a bit slower:

-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440fp -ffast-math ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot && time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot

real    1m17.901s
user    1m17.828s
sys     0m0.036s
-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440 -ffast-math ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot && time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot

real    0m41.180s
user    0m41.116s
sys     0m0.040s
-bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=G3 -ffast-math ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot && time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot

real    1m14.820s
user    1m14.760s
sys     0m0.044s

Magnus Hjorth <mh@omnisys•se> a écrit : Hi,

Have you tried using the -ffast-math option?

/Magnus

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:47:50 +0100
Patrice Bouchand 
 wrote:

> 
> FYI, I got the following answer on mplayer mailing list:
> 
> > Apparently -mcpu=440fp is the one. However, it's possible, that GCC
> > "optimizations" actually make the code slower.
> 
> Can someone confirme this possiblity ?
> 
> Any answer would be greatly appreciated ;) 
> 
> 
>     Patrice Bouchand
> 
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> >    I was searching for the best mcpu option for amcc440, compiling and
> > running a small program you can find here: 
> > http://magnux.free.fr/gcc/mandelbrot.c. My distro is a ppc fedora core
> > 6, and results are obviously the same using DENX4.0.
> > 
> > --------------------
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> > time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> > 
> > real    1m15.059s
> > user    1m14.996s
> > sys     0m0.060s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440 ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> > time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> > 
> > real    0m39.606s
> > user    0m39.552s
> > sys     0m0.028s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440fp ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> > time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> > 
> > real    1m15.016s
> > user    1m14.988s
> > sys     0m0.024s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -msoft-float ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> > time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> > 
> > real    0m39.577s
> > user    0m39.544s
> > sys     0m0.032s
> > --------------------
> > 
> > * I do not explain why not using FPU gives better results ?
> > 
> > * I did also a test with bzip2.c
> > ( http://pag.csail.mit.edu/~smcc/projects/single-file-programs/bzip2.c ).
> > 
> > ----------------------
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 && time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c
> > && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> > 
> > real    0m18.478s
> > user    0m18.216s
> > sys     0m0.152s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 &&
> > time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> > 
> > real    0m18.786s
> > user    0m18.544s
> > sys     0m0.128s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440fp ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 &&
> > time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> > 
> > real    0m18.811s
> > user    0m18.548s
> > sys     0m0.144s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=G3 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 &&
> > time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> > 
> > real    0m18.871s
> > user    0m18.644s
> > sys     0m0.104s
> > ----------------------
> > 
> > * mcpu option seems to not have any effect ?
> > 
> > *  My third test was to compile and run mplayer.
> > - With default options (no mcpu specified), my test mpeg was smooth.
> > - With mcpu=440fp, my test mpeg was not smooth.
> > 
> >  Can anybody bring me some lights about the right gcc mcpu option for
> > amcc440 ?
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> >        Patrice Bouchand
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos
> > questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des
> > expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
> > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

---------------------------------
 Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6054 bytes --]