public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* e600 core power management
@ 2008-07-07 11:48 Matt Sealey
  2008-07-07 18:04 ` Matt Sealey
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matt Sealey @ 2008-07-07 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ppc-dev

Hi guys,

Quick question, am I right (and looking at idle_6xx.S, I think I am) in thinking that
during the idle process, by default, an e600 core such as the 7448 or MPC8610 will
automatically transition to a NAP state, thus being as low power as possible?

Has anyone done any benchmarking of the power consumption of the processor when
this transition is disabled (remove CPU_FTR_MAYBE_CAN_NAP) or have a rough idea
what the benefits might be?

Is there a performance reason for removing the feature or disabling naps altogether?
The powersave-nap sysctl controls whether DOZE or NAP is entered on processors that
support a seperate HID0[DOZE], however is it possible to extend it such that nap
is never entered?

-- 
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa•com>
Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-07 18:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-07 11:48 e600 core power management Matt Sealey
2008-07-07 18:04 ` Matt Sealey

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox