From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel•crashing.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation•org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail•com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm•com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora•org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe•ca>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab•com>, Oliver <oohall@gmail•com>,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger•kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger•kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux•vnet.ibm.com>,
"netdev@vger•kernel.org" <netdev@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC on writel and writel_relaxed
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:42:56 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1522219376.7364.109.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFw24R3YAujir59GdG+sBBQOA9WyXySEN3AcEYK99ZHuwQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 20:26 -1000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <benh@kernel•crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is why, I want (with your agreement) to define clearly and once
> > and for all, that the Linux semantics of writel are that it is ordered
> > with previous writes to coherent memory (*)
>
> Honestly, I think those are the sane semantics. In fact, make it
> "ordered with previous writes" full stop, since it's not only ordered
> wrt previous writes to memory, but also previous writel's.
Of course. It was somewhat a given that it's ordered vs. any previous
MMIO actually, but it doesn't hurt to spell it out once more.
> > Also, can I assume the above ordering with writel() equally applies to
> > readl() or not ?
> >
> > IE:
> > dma_buf->foo = 1;
> > readl(STUPID_DEVICE_DMA_KICK_ON_READ);
>
> If that KICK_ON_READ is UC, then that's definitely the case. And
> honestly, status registers like that really should always be UC.
>
> But if somebody sets the area WC (which is crazy), then I think it
> might be at least debatable. x86 semantics does allow reads to be done
> before previous writes (or, put another way, writes to be buffered -
> the buffers are ordered so writes don't get re-ordered, but reads can
> happen during the buffering).
Right, for now I worry about UC semantics. Once we have nailed that, we
can look at WC, which is a lot more tricky as archs differs more
widely, but one thing at a time.
> But UC accesses are always done entirely ordered, and honestly, any
> status register that starts a DMA would not make sense any other way.
>
> Of course, you'd have to be pretty odd to want to start a DMA with a
> read anyway - partly exactly because it's bad for performance since
> reads will be synchronous and not buffered like a write).
I have bad memories of old adaptec controllers ...
That said, I think the above might not be right on ARM if we want to
make it the rule, Will, what do you reckon ?
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-28 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1521692689.16434.293.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
[not found] ` <CAOSf1CFv1HHCL3YOVhRn2U=grdNjaQ=A4m3xwxN2Rek1-_TySg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1521726722.16434.312.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
[not found] ` <20180323163510.GC13033@ziepe.ca>
[not found] ` <1521854626.16434.359.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
[not found] ` <58ce5b83f40f4775bec1be8db66adb0d@AcuMS.aculab.com>
[not found] ` <20180326165425.GA15554@ziepe.ca>
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a1zeMyj+Z-y4ER4moY6Zip9EWNOinf+VnboGOrgiwbBZA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20180326202545.GB15554@ziepe.ca>
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a3fc43ZcW626hmsd3DVcLw7hGkdUMxp7s4Rn3mdkziwMQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20180326210951.GD15554@ziepe.ca>
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a2UU1xAM0NLo7Q4-Xgo1SzY3De1uqpFudr+2ZW7nHEPmA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1522101616.7364.13.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
2018-03-27 14:46 ` RFC on writel and writel_relaxed Sinan Kaya
2018-03-27 15:01 ` Jose Abreu
2018-03-27 15:10 ` Will Deacon
2018-03-27 18:54 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-03-27 19:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-27 20:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-27 21:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 0:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-28 1:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 2:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-28 3:24 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-28 4:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 6:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-28 11:41 ` okaya
2018-03-28 15:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 15:55 ` David Miller
2018-03-28 16:23 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-03-28 21:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 22:09 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-03-29 9:20 ` Will Deacon
2018-03-29 13:56 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-29 14:04 ` David Miller
2018-03-29 16:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-29 16:59 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-30 1:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-04-02 13:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-28 4:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 6:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-28 6:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2018-03-28 6:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-28 6:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 7:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-28 7:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 9:07 ` Will Deacon
2018-03-28 9:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 10:13 ` Aw: " Lino Sanfilippo
2018-03-28 10:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 11:30 ` David Laight
2018-03-28 15:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-28 16:16 ` David Laight
2018-03-28 1:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-27 21:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-03-27 21:54 Alexander Duyck
2018-03-27 22:35 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-27 23:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1522219376.7364.109.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab$(echo .)com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
--cc=jgg@ziepe$(echo .)ca \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora$(echo .)org \
--cc=oohall@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=paulmck@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox