* [PATCH 2/3 net-next] sunvnet: vnet_ack() should check if !start_cons to send a missed trigger
@ 2014-11-09 1:42 Sowmini Varadhan
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sowmini Varadhan @ 2014-11-09 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, sowmini.varadhan; +Cc: netdev, david.stevens
As per comments in vnet_start_xmit, for the edge case
when outgoing vnet_start_xmit() data and an incoming STOPPED
ACK cross each other in flight, we may need to send the missed
START trigger from maybe_tx_wakeup() after checking for a
false value of start_cons
Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle•com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c
index deb395a..826b385 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static int vnet_ack(struct vnet_port *port, void *msgbuf)
*/
dr->cons = next_idx(end, dr);
desc = vio_dring_entry(dr, dr->cons);
- if (desc->hdr.state == VIO_DESC_READY && port->start_cons) {
+ if (desc->hdr.state == VIO_DESC_READY && !port->start_cons) {
/* vnet_start_xmit() just populated this dring but missed
* sending the "start" LDC message to the consumer.
* Send a "start" trigger on its behalf.
--
1.8.4.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-11-09 1:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-09 1:42 [PATCH 2/3 net-next] sunvnet: vnet_ack() should check if !start_cons to send a missed trigger Sowmini Varadhan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox