public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli•us>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu•com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail•com>,
	davem@davemloft•net, netdev@vger•kernel.org,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail•com, eric.dumazet@gmail•com,
	mrv@mojatatu•com, simon.horman@netronome•com,
	alex.aring@gmail•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 1/4] net netlink: Add new type NLA_BITFIELD_32
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:08:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728140840.GC1857@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c17a575-53bb-1f25-4a9a-7418f99660f2@mojatatu.com>

Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:51:41PM CEST, jhs@mojatatu•com wrote:
>On 17-07-25 10:41 AM, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 7/23/17 7:35 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>> > In the most basic form, the user specifies the attribute policy as:
>> > [ATTR_GOO] = { .type = NLA_BITFIELD_32, .validation_data = &myvalidflags },
>> > 
>> > where myvalidflags is the bit mask of the flags the kernel understands.
>> > 
>> > If the user _does not_ provide myvalidflags then the attribute will
>> > also be rejected.
>> 
>> No other netlink attribute has this requirement.
>
>This is the first one where we have to inspect content. We add things
>when we need them - as in this case.
>
>> Users of the attributes
>> are the only ones that know if a value is valid or not (e.g, attribute
>> passing a device index) and those are always checked in line.
>
>It doesnt make sense that every user of the API has to repeat that
>validation code. Same principle as someone specifying that a type is
>u32 and have the nla validation check it. At some point we never had
>the u32 validation code. Then it was factored out because everyone
>repeats the same boilerplate code.
>I see this in the same spirit.

Agreed.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-28 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-24  1:35 [PATCH net-next v11 0/4] net sched actions: improve dump performance Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24  1:35 ` [PATCH net-next v11 1/4] net netlink: Add new type NLA_BITFIELD_32 Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24 11:14   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-25 11:14     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24 11:18   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-25 11:15     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-25 14:41   ` David Ahern
2017-07-28 13:51     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-28 14:08       ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2017-07-28 14:19       ` David Ahern
2017-07-28 14:55         ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-28 15:04         ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-28 15:13           ` David Ahern
2017-07-28 21:55             ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24  1:35 ` [PATCH net-next v11 2/4] net sched actions: Use proper root attribute table for actions Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24  1:35 ` [PATCH net-next v11 3/4] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24 11:27   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-25 11:22     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-25 11:33       ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-25 12:34         ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-25 12:37           ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-28 13:41             ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-28 14:12               ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-28 14:52                 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-28 14:57                   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-28 15:08                   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-28 15:45                     ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-28 22:10                       ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-29  7:19                         ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-29 11:21                           ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24  1:35 ` [PATCH net-next v11 4/4] net sched actions: add time filter for action dumping Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24 11:34   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-25 11:27     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-25 11:34       ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170728140840.GC1857@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
    --cc=alex.aring@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu$(echo .)com \
    --cc=mrv@mojatatu$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=simon.horman@netronome$(echo .)com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox