public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli•us>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu•com>
Cc: davem@davemloft•net, netdev@vger•kernel.org,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail•com, dsahern@gmail•com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail•com, mrv@mojatatu•com,
	simon.horman@netronome•com, alex.aring@gmail•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 3/4] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:57:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728145718.GF1857@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e835ac7-0700-726d-7f6c-6e584ff073eb@mojatatu.com>

Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 04:52:02PM CEST, jhs@mojatatu•com wrote:
>On 17-07-28 10:12 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:41:44PM CEST, jhs@mojatatu•com wrote:
>[..]
>> 
>> Looks like a big mess to be honest. Mixing up u32* u32 void*. I don't
>> understand ****. Would be probably good to first apply my review comment
>> on the function itselt, then to add the checks :)
>> 
>
>I havent even compiled/test that Jiri.
>Just ignore the void * and assume it is a u32 *.
>
>I am trying to avoid doing unlucky number 13 patch.

I'll rather wait for you to send the code in proper shape so I can
decypher easily and don't have to guess.


>So feedback on this is good. Just look at what it is disallowing
>first.
>
>back later.
>
>cheers,
>jamal
>
>> 
>> > I can think of.
>> > 
>> > static int validate_nla_bitfield32(const struct nlattr *nla,
>> >                                     void *valid_flags_allowed)
>> > {
>> >         const struct nla_bitfield32 *bf = nla_data(nla);
>> >         u32 *valid_flags_mask = valid_flags_allowed;
>> > 
>> >         if (!valid_flags_allowed)
>> >                 return -EINVAL;
>> >         /*disallow invalid selector */
>> >         if ((bf->selector & valid_flags_allowed) >*valid_flags_allowed)
>> >                 return -EINVAL;
>> >         /*disallow invalid bit values */
>> >         if (bf->value & ~*valid_flags_mask)
>> >                 return -EINVAL;
>> >         /*disallow valid bit values that are not selected*/
>> >         if (bf->value & ~nbf->selector)
>> >                 return -EINVAL;
>> > 
>> >         return 0;
>> > }
>> > 
>> > cheers,
>> > jamal
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-28 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-24  1:35 [PATCH net-next v11 0/4] net sched actions: improve dump performance Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24  1:35 ` [PATCH net-next v11 1/4] net netlink: Add new type NLA_BITFIELD_32 Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24 11:14   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-25 11:14     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24 11:18   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-25 11:15     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-25 14:41   ` David Ahern
2017-07-28 13:51     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-28 14:08       ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-28 14:19       ` David Ahern
2017-07-28 14:55         ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-28 15:04         ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-28 15:13           ` David Ahern
2017-07-28 21:55             ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24  1:35 ` [PATCH net-next v11 2/4] net sched actions: Use proper root attribute table for actions Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24  1:35 ` [PATCH net-next v11 3/4] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24 11:27   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-25 11:22     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-25 11:33       ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-25 12:34         ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-25 12:37           ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-28 13:41             ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-28 14:12               ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-28 14:52                 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-28 14:57                   ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2017-07-28 15:08                   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-28 15:45                     ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-28 22:10                       ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-29  7:19                         ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-29 11:21                           ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24  1:35 ` [PATCH net-next v11 4/4] net sched actions: add time filter for action dumping Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-24 11:34   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-07-25 11:27     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-07-25 11:34       ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170728145718.GF1857@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
    --cc=alex.aring@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu$(echo .)com \
    --cc=mrv@mojatatu$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=simon.horman@netronome$(echo .)com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox