public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner•de>
To: netdev@vger•kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Don't clear read-only PHY interrupt
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 13:57:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220512115730.GA4703@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97d9528bb7fbee7313c5c6fb3a80346faaa32c13.1652343655.git.lukas@wunner.de>

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:42:02AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Upon receiving data from the Interrupt Endpoint, the SMSC LAN95xx driver
> attempts to clear the signaled interrupts by writing "all ones" to the
> Interrupt Status Register.
> 
> However the driver only ever enables a single type of interrupt, namely
> the PHY Interrupt.  And according to page 119 of the LAN950x datasheet,
> its bit in the Interrupt Status Register is read-only.  There's no other
> way to clear it than in a separate PHY register:
> 
> https://www.microchip.com/content/dam/mchp/documents/UNG/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/LAN950x-Data-Sheet-DS00001875D.pdf
> 
> Consequently, writing "all ones" to the Interrupt Status Register is
> pointless and can be dropped.
> 
> Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix•de> # LAN9514/9512/9500
> Tested-by: Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail•com> # LAN9514
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner•de>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch>

Forgot to add Andrew's R-b which he kindly provided here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/YnGqtCDVHHpo%2FS+L@lunn.ch/

Let's see if patchwork picks the tag up if I add it like this.
My apologies for the inconvenience.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-12 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-12  8:42 [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] Polling be gone on LAN95xx Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12  8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/7] usbnet: Run unregister_netdev() before unbind() again Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12  8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Don't clear read-only PHY interrupt Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 11:57   ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2022-05-12  8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Don't reset PHY behind PHY driver's back Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 12:12   ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12  8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Avoid link settings race on interrupt reception Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 12:15   ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12  8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Forward PHY interrupts to PHY driver to avoid polling Lukas Wunner
2022-05-17 10:18   ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-05-19 19:08     ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-19 21:22       ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-05-23  9:43         ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-23 11:38           ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-05-23 12:34           ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-23 13:47             ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-24  0:52               ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-24  1:08           ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-24  6:16             ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-05-24 12:03               ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-26 13:55                 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-24 12:13             ` Lukas Wunner
2022-06-06  1:28               ` Andrew Lunn
2022-08-26  6:51         ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-26  7:19           ` Lukas Wunner
2022-08-26  7:41             ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-26  7:53               ` Lukas Wunner
2022-08-26  8:29                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-29 11:40                   ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-09-18 19:13                     ` Lukas Wunner
2022-09-18 20:41                       ` Florian Fainelli
2022-09-18 20:55                         ` Lukas Wunner
2022-09-18 22:11                           ` Florian Fainelli
2022-09-23  4:20                             ` Lukas Wunner
2022-09-22 13:21                       ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-05-12  8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/7] net: phy: smsc: Cache interrupt mask Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 12:17   ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12  8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/7] net: phy: smsc: Cope with hot-removal in interrupt handler Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 12:19   ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-13 10:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] Polling be gone on LAN95xx patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220512115730.GA4703@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner$(echo .)de \
    --cc=andrew@lunn$(echo .)ch \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox