public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine•com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat•com>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, oss-drivers@corigine•com,
	Diana Wang <na.wang@corigine•com>,
	Peng Zhang <peng.zhang@corigine•com>,
	Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom•com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse•net>,
	Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia•com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel•org>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel•com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel•com>,
	Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail•com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp•com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch>
Subject: driver uABI review list? (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/3] nfp: support VF multi-queues configuration)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 06:34:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220921063448.5b0dd32b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220920151419.76050-1-simon.horman@corigine.com>

On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:14:16 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> this short series adds the max_vf_queue generic devlink device parameter,
> the intention of this is to allow configuration of the number of queues
> associated with VFs, and facilitates having VFs with different queue
> counts.
> 
> The series also adds support for multi-queue VFs to the nfp driver
> and support for the max_vf_queue feature described above.

I think a similar API was discussed in the past by... Broadcom?
IIRC they wanted more flexibility, i.e. being able to set the
guaranteed and max allowed queue count.

Overall this seems like a typical resource division problem so 
we should try to use the devlink resource API or similar. More 
complex policies like guaranteed+max are going to be a pain over
params.


I wanted to ask a more general question, however. I see that you
haven't CCed even the major (for some def.) vendors' maintainers.

Would it be helpful for participation if we had a separate mailing 
list for discussing driver uAPI introduction which would hopefully 
be lower traffic? Or perhaps we can require a subject tag ([PATCH
net-next uapi] ?) so that people can set up email filters?

The cost is obviously yet another process thing to remember, and 
while this is nothing that lore+lei can't already do based on file 
path filters - I doubt y'all care enough to set that up for
yourselves... :)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-21 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-20 15:14 [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/3] nfp: support VF multi-queues configuration Simon Horman
2022-09-20 15:14 ` [PATCH/RFC net-next 1/3] " Simon Horman
2022-09-20 15:14 ` [PATCH/RFC net-next 2/3] devlink: Add new "max_vf_queue" generic device param Simon Horman
2022-09-20 18:27   ` Edward Cree
2022-09-21  1:47     ` Yinjun Zhang
2022-09-20 15:14 ` [PATCH/RFC net-next 3/3] nfp: devlink: add the devlink parameter "max_vf_queue" support Simon Horman
2022-09-21 13:34 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-09-21 13:39   ` driver uABI review list? (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/3] nfp: support VF multi-queues configuration) Simon Horman
2022-09-22 13:37     ` Gal Pressman
2022-09-22 13:49       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-22 16:04   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-22 16:14     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-22 19:08       ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-22 19:24         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-22 17:37     ` Andrew Lunn
2022-09-22 19:31       ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220921063448.5b0dd32b@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn$(echo .)ch \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse$(echo .)net \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom$(echo .)com \
    --cc=na.wang@corigine$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=oss-drivers@corigine$(echo .)com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peng.zhang@corigine$(echo .)com \
    --cc=saeed@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine$(echo .)com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox