From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels•com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
"eric.dumazet@gmail•com" <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>
Cc: "ebiederm@xmission•com" <ebiederm@xmission•com>,
"netdev@vger•kernel.org" <netdev@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] hash: Introduce ptr_hash_mix routine
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:11:41 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5020DBCD.7040806@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120806.134459.954167716448843820.davem@davemloft.net>
On 08/07/2012 12:44 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels•com>
> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:13:47 +0400
>
>> @@ -67,4 +68,13 @@ static inline unsigned long hash_ptr(const void *ptr, unsigned int bits)
>> {
>> return hash_long((unsigned long)ptr, bits);
>> }
>> +
>> +static inline u32 ptr_hash_mix(const void *ptr)
>> +{
>> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
>> + return (u32)(unsigned long)ptr;
>> +#else
>> + return (u32)((unsigned long)ptr >> L1_CACHE_SHIFT);
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> #endif /* _LINUX_HASH_H */
>
> This doesn't make much sense to me.
>
> If the whole 32-bits of the pointer is useful for entropy on 32-bit
> why isn't the whole 64-bits useful on 64-bit?
>
> I would, instead, expect something like:
>
> ptr ^ (ptr >> 32)
>
> for the 64-bit case.
>
> Also, that L1_CACHE_SHIFT is something callers can decide to do.
>
> Only they know the size of their structure, the alignment used to
> allocate such objects, and thus what bits are "less relevant" and
> therefore profitable to elide from the bottom of the value.
> .
Maybe it would be better to change the way neigh_table->hash work more
significantly then? Currently it is used like
hash = tbl->hash(key, dev, tbl->rnd);
hash >>= (32 - tbl->hash_shift);
i.e. the caller asks for u32 hash value and then trims some lower bits.
It can be changed like
hash = tbl->hash(key, dev, tbl->rnd, tbl->hash_shift);
making the hash fn trim the bits itself. This will allow us to use the
existing (declared to be proven to be effective) hash_ptr() routine for
the net_device pointer hashing (it requires the number of bits to use).
E.g. the arp hash might look like
static u32 arp_hashfn(u32 key, struct net_device *dev, u32 hash_rnd,
unsigned int bits)
{
return hash_ptr(dev, bits) ^ hash_32(key * hash_rnd, bits);
}
and the ndisc one like
static u32 ndisc_hashfn(u32 *pkey, struct net_device *dev, u32 *hash_rnd,
unsigned int bits)
{
return hash_ptr(dev, bits) ^
hash_32(key[0] * hash_rnd[0], bits) ^
hash_32(key[1] * hash_rnd[1], bits) ^
hash_32(key[2] * hash_rnd[2], bits) ^
hash_32(key[3] * hash_rnd[3], bits);
}
What do you think?
Thanks,
Pavel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-07 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-06 14:13 [PATCH net-next 0/6] Per-net and on-demand link indices (and related) v2 Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-06 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] hash: Introduce ptr_hash_mix routine Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-06 20:44 ` David Miller
2012-08-07 9:11 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2012-08-07 9:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-07 9:55 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-07 10:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-07 21:39 ` David Miller
2012-08-06 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/6] net: Dont use ifindices in hash fns Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-06 14:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] net: Allow to create links with given ifindex Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-07 11:01 ` [PATCH 2/5 (resend)] " Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-07 13:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-07 21:42 ` David Miller
2012-08-06 14:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] veth: Allow to create peer link " Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-07 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/5 (resend)] " Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-07 13:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-07 18:36 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-08 9:00 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-08 13:25 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-08 13:38 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-06 14:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] net: Make ifindex generation per-net namespace Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-07 11:02 ` [PATCH 4/5 (resend)] " Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-07 12:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-07 12:37 ` [PATCH 4/5 (resend)] net: Make ifindex generation per-net namespace (v2) Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-07 13:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-06 14:15 ` [PATCH 6/6] net: Loopback ifindex is constant now Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-07 11:02 ` [PATCH 5/5 (resend)] " Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-07 13:13 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5020DBCD.7040806@parallels.com \
--to=xemul@parallels$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission$(echo .)com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox