public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech•com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] veth: remove hardware checksum feature
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:20:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520419A7.8060704@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52041802.9040304@candelatech.com>

On 08/08/2013 03:13 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 01:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 12:43 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>>
>>> So, the question is:  Is there any time that I *should* be mucking with
>>> skb->ip_summed when bridging pkts from one device to another on modern
>>> kernels?  I'm using the ptype_all hook to grab packets, and ndo_start_xmit
>>> to send them, in case that matters.
>>
>>
>> ndo_start_xmit() is likely bypassing the core network fallbacks.
>>
>> You might try dev_hard_start_xmit() instead
>
> Looks like it should work nicely, except it would be really
> nice if I could short-circuit the xmit_nit() part for my
> protocol handler.
>
> Think there would be any interest in allowing the ptype_all
> handlers to optionally register a direction (ie tx-only, rx-only, both)
> and have dev_queue_xmit_nit() pay attention to that?

Actually, seems I might be able to abuse the ptype->af_packet_priv
and skb->sk and make the xmit_nit() not pass it back up...

Still might be interesting to have direction support in the ptype
handlers though...

Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech•com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-08 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-25 17:20 [PATCH] veth: remove hardware checksum feature Vitaly E. Lavrov
2013-07-25 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-08  0:07 ` Ben Greear
2013-08-08  0:12   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-08  0:23     ` Ben Greear
2013-08-08  1:08       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-08  1:54         ` Ben Greear
2013-08-08  2:52           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-08 19:43             ` Ben Greear
2013-08-08 20:16               ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-08 22:13                 ` Ben Greear
2013-08-08 22:20                   ` Ben Greear [this message]
2013-08-08 22:22                   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-08 22:35                     ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=520419A7.8060704@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech$(echo .)com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox