From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver•com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug•ch>
Cc: <davem@davemloft•net>, <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>,
<netdev@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] lib/rhashtable: allow user to set the minimum shifts of shrinking
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:28:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54043C45.7090005@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140901090302.GB27933@casper.infradead.org>
On 09/01/2014 05:03 PM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 08/30/14 at 02:48pm, Ying Xue wrote:
>> Although rhashtable library allows user to specify a quiet big size
>> for user's created hash table, the table may be shrunk to a
>> very small size - HASH_MIN_SIZE(4) after object is removed from
>> the table at the first time. Subsequently, even if the total amount
>> of objects saved in the table is quite lower than user's initial
>> setting in a long time, the hash table size is still dynamically
>> adjusted by rhashtable_shrink() or rhashtable_expand() each time
>> object is inserted or removed from the table. However, as
>> synchronize_rcu() has to be called when table is shrunk or
>> expanded by the two functions, we should permit user to set the
>> minimum table size through configuring the minimum number of shifts
>> according to user specific requirement, avoiding these expensive
>> actions of shrinking or expanding because of calling synchronize_rcu().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver•com>
>
> I see the following warning when compiling:
>
> In file included from lib/rhashtable.c:17:0:
> lib/rhashtable.c: In function ‘rhashtable_init’:
> include/linux/kernel.h:715:17: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> (void) (&_max1 == &_max2); \
> ^
> lib/rhashtable.c:570:22: note: in expansion of macro ‘max’
> params->min_shift = max(params->min_shift, ilog2(HASH_MIN_SIZE));
>
>
Thanks for your check.
After I made below change, the compiling warning disappears.
+ params->min_shift = max(params->min_shift,
+ (size_t)ilog2(HASH_MIN_SIZE));
+
But when I check the patch format with scripts/checkpatch.pl, below
warning occurs:
./scripts/checkpatch.pl
0001-lib-rhashtable-allow-user-to-set-the-minimum-shifts-.patch
WARNING: max() should probably be max_t(size_t, params->min_shift,
ilog2(HASH_MIN_SIZE))
#77: FILE: lib/rhashtable.c:570:
+ params->min_shift = max(params->min_shift,
(size_t)ilog2(HASH_MIN_SIZE));
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 46 lines checked
0001-lib-rhashtable-allow-user-to-set-the-minimum-shifts-.patch has
style problems, please review.
Do you think it's worth replacing max() macro with max_t() regarding
above suggestion?
By the way, if the replacement should do, all max() macro in the
lib/rhashtable.c should be replaced as well.
Thanks,
Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-01 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-30 6:48 [PATCH net-next v3] lib/rhashtable: allow user to set the minimum shifts of shrinking Ying Xue
2014-09-01 9:03 ` Thomas Graf
2014-09-01 9:28 ` Ying Xue [this message]
2014-09-01 9:41 ` Thomas Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54043C45.7090005@windriver.com \
--to=ying.xue@windriver$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug$(echo .)ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox