public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks•com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli•us>
Cc: sfeldma@gmail•com, jhs@mojatatu•com, bcrl@kvack•org,
	tgraf@suug•ch, john.fastabend@gmail•com,
	stephen@networkplumber•org, vyasevic@redhat•com,
	ronen.arad@intel•com, netdev@vger•kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft•net, shm@cumulusnetworks•com,
	gospo@cumulusnetworks•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] swdevice: add new api to set and del bridge port attributes
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 17:03:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C440F7.8020209@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150124112657.GA1879@nanopsycho.orion>

On 1/24/15, 3:26 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:10:01AM CET, roopa@cumulusnetworks•com wrote:
>> On 1/23/15, 2:45 PM, roopa wrote:
>>> On 1/23/15, 8:06 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>> Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:58:57PM CET, roopa@cumulusnetworks•com wrote:
>>>>> On 1/23/15, 2:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip..>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>> + *    netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink - Notify switch device port
>>>>>> of bridge
>>>>>> + *    attribute delete
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + *    @dev: port device
>>>>>> + *    @nlh: netlink msg with bridge port attributes
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + *    Notify switch device port of bridge port attribute delete
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +int netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink(struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> +                      struct nlmsghdr *nlh, u16 flags)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +    const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
>>>>>> +    struct net_device *lower_dev;
>>>>>> +    struct list_head *iter;
>>>>>> +    int ret = 0, err = 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    if (!(dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_NETFUNC_OFFLOAD))
>>>>>> +        return err;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    if (ops->ndo_bridge_dellink) {
>>>>>> +        WARN_ON(!ops->ndo_switch_parent_id_get);
>>>>>> +        return ops->ndo_bridge_dellink(dev, nlh, flags);
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    netdev_for_each_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
>>>>>> +        err = netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink(lower_dev, nlh,
>>>>>> flags);
>>>>>> +        if (err)
>>>>>> +            ret = err;
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    return ret;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink);
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there any other place, other than bridge code, this functions are
>>>>>> suppored to be called from?
>>>>> No other place today. Its usually the master that implements
>>>>> ndo_bridge_setlink/dellink.
>>>>>
>>>>>> If not, which I consider likely, it would
>>>>>> make more sense to me to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - move netdev_for_each_lower_dev iterations directly to bridge code
>>>>>> - let the masters (bond, team, ..) implement ndo_bridge_*link and do
>>>>>>    the traversing there (can be in a form of pre-prepared default
>>>>>>    ndo callback (ndo_dflt_netdev_switch_port_bridge_*link)
>>>>> But, i am still not understanding why i would modify bond, team and
>>>>> other
>>>>> slaves
>>>> Well, that is the usual way to propagate ndo calls. People are used to
>>>> this. It is visible right away in bonding/other code that is propagated
>>>> some ndo call to slaves. With your code, that is somehow hidden and only
>>>> dependent on NETIF_F_HW_NETFUNC_OFFLOAD flag.
>>>>
>>>> Note that there are only couple of "master drivers" (for this, most
>>>> likely
>>>> only bond and team modifications are needed).
>>> ndo_bridge_setlink today is only implemented by drivers that implement
>>> bridging function.
>>> So, having the bond and team driver implement it...seems odd.
> Well, it is not odd. It is ok I believe. Same as for example:
> .ndo_set_mac_address
> .ndo_change_mtu
> .ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid
> .ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid
> .ndo_poll_controller
> .ndo_netpoll_setup
> .ndo_netpoll_cleanup
>
> All take care of propagating the ndo to slaves.
These mostly operate on netdevs directly.
I do have some hesitation, But, I will take your suggestion and add it 
to the bond and team drivers,
>
>>> But if you insist, i am going to do just that.
>> A side note, I dont see any reason for ndo_bridge_setlink to be renamed to
>> ndo_setlink. Because it seems to take the whole netlink msg anyways. It can
>> be used to offload other link attributes besides bridging (vxlan and so on).
>> Any thoughts on that ?.
> Well, it is PF_BRIDGE so I think that the name is accurate.
The ndo op does not necessarily have to be tied to the netlink msg family.
I don't plan to rename it now. But, in future if i see more value in 
reusing it for other offloads,
i will come back to this.

Thanks for the review.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-25  1:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-23  4:33 [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] swdevice: add new api to set and del bridge port attributes roopa
2015-01-23 10:41 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-01-23 15:58   ` roopa
2015-01-23 16:06     ` Jiri Pirko
2015-01-23 22:45       ` roopa
2015-01-23 23:10         ` roopa
2015-01-24 11:26           ` Jiri Pirko
2015-01-25  1:03             ` roopa [this message]
2015-01-23 11:24 ` Rosen, Rami

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54C440F7.8020209@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --to=roopa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack$(echo .)org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=ronen.arad@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sfeldma@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=shm@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber$(echo .)org \
    --cc=tgraf@suug$(echo .)ch \
    --cc=vyasevic@redhat$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox