From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech•com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: w@1wt•eu, vijayp@vijayp•ca, tom@herbertland•com,
ben@decadent•org.uk, sd@queasysnail•net,
hannes@stressinduktion•org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
stable@vger•kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation•org,
cwang@twopensource•com, netdev@vger•kernel.org, ej@evanjones•ca,
nicolas.dichtel@6wind•com, phil@nwl•cc,
makita.toshiaki@lab•ntt.co.jp, xiyou.wangcong@gmail•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don???t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good.
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:23:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57361B8A.70404@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160513.142121.1201664846732017162.davem@davemloft.net>
On 05/13/2016 11:21 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech•com>
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:57:19 -0700
>
>> How do you feel about a new socket-option to allow a socket to
>> request the old veth behaviour?
>
> I depend upon the opinions of the experts who work upstream on and
> maintain these components, since it is an area I am not so familiar
> with.
>
> Generally speaking asking me directly for opinions on matters like
> this isn't the way to go, in fact I kind of find it irritating. It
> can't all be on me.
>
Fair enough, thanks for your time.
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech•com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-13 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <lsq.1461711744.351546278@decadent.org.uk>
2016-04-26 23:02 ` [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good Ben Hutchings
2016-04-27 15:59 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-27 18:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-04-28 0:00 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-04-28 0:14 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-28 10:29 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2016-04-28 13:45 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 19:18 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-04-30 18:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-04-30 19:40 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 19:54 ` Tom Herbert
2016-04-30 20:59 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 21:13 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-04-30 21:29 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 21:36 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-04-30 21:52 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-30 22:01 ` Vijay Pandurangan
2016-04-30 22:43 ` Ben Greear
2016-05-01 5:30 ` [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don???t " Willy Tarreau
2016-05-13 16:57 ` Ben Greear
2016-05-13 18:21 ` David Miller
2016-05-13 18:23 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2016-04-30 22:42 ` [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don’t " Tom Herbert
2016-04-30 20:15 ` Vijay Pandurangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57361B8A.70404@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech$(echo .)com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=ben@decadent$(echo .)org.uk \
--cc=cwang@twopensource$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=ej@evanjones$(echo .)ca \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab$(echo .)ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind$(echo .)com \
--cc=phil@nwl$(echo .)cc \
--cc=sd@queasysnail$(echo .)net \
--cc=stable@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland$(echo .)com \
--cc=vijayp@vijayp$(echo .)ca \
--cc=w@1wt$(echo .)eu \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox