public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail•com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat•com>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xdp: adjust xdp redirect tracepoint to include return error code
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 12:43:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5995F1D6.8040103@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170817212857.1de3f557@redhat.com>

On 08/17/2017 12:28 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 11:46:10 -0700 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail•com> wrote:
> 
>> On 08/17/2017 09:22 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>> The return error code need to be included in the tracepoint
>>> xdp:xdp_redirect, else its not possible to distinguish successful or
>>> failed XDP_REDIRECT transmits.
>>>
>>> XDP have no queuing mechanism. Thus, it is fairly easily to overrun a
>>> NIC transmit queue.  The eBPF program invoking helpers (bpf_redirect
>>> or bpf_redirect_map) to redirect a packet doesn't get any feedback
>>> whether the packet was actually transmitted.
>>>
>>> Info on failed transmits in the tracepoint xdp:xdp_redirect, is
>>> interesting as this opens for providing a feedback-loop to the
>>> receiving XDP program.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat•com>
>>> ---  
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -2532,12 +2535,14 @@ int xdp_do_redirect(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
>>>  	ri->map = NULL;
>>>  	if (unlikely(!fwd)) {
>>>  		bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_redirect(index);

I think we should drop the warn_invalid now that we have a tracepoint.
The tracepoint is much nicer for debugging vs a warning for what might
be a valid case depending on xdp program.

>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>>> +		goto out;  
>>
>> It doesn't look like there is a check in trace_xdp_redirect to
>> avoid dereferencing a NULL fwd pointer here (*to in trace code
>> path). Did I miss something?
> 
> Nice that you spotted this in your review, but the __string() macro
> used in trace code already takes case of this, see output:
> 
>  xdp:xdp_redirect: prog=39cf08f65683838a from=ixgbe2 to=(null) action=REDIRECT err=-22

Great thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-17 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-17 16:22 [PATCH 0/2] xdp: adjust xdp redirect tracepoint Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-17 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] ixgbe: change ndo_xdp_xmit return code on xmit errors Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-17 18:32   ` John Fastabend
2017-08-17 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] xdp: adjust xdp redirect tracepoint to include return error code Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-17 18:46   ` John Fastabend
2017-08-17 19:28     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-17 19:43       ` John Fastabend [this message]
2017-08-18 12:29         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-18 12:38           ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-08-18 23:19 ` [PATCH 0/2] xdp: adjust xdp redirect tracepoint David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5995F1D6.8040103@gmail.com \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox